Category Archives: Techno-fascism

The End of Reality?

In 1888,  the year before he went insane, Friedrich Nietzsche wrote the following in Twilight of the Idols:

We have got rid of the real world: what world is left?  The apparent world perhaps? … But no!  Along with the real world we’ve done away with the apparent world as well.

So, if you feel you also may be going insane in the present climate of digital screen life, where real is unreal but realer than real, the apparent is cryptic, and up is down, true is false, and what you see you don’t, it has a history.  One hundred and thirty-two years ago, Nietzsche added that “something extraordinarily nasty and evil is about to make its debut.”  We know it did, and the bloody butcher’s bench known as the twentieth century was the result. Nihilism stepped onto center stage and has been the star of the show ever since, straight through to 2020.  Roberto Calasso puts it this way in Literature and the Gods:

Here we are, announces Nietzsche, and it would be hard not to hear a mocking ring in his voice.  We thought we were living in a world where the fog had lifted, a disenchanted, ascertainable, verifiable world.  And instead everything has gone back to being a ‘fable’ again.  How are we to get our bearings … This is the paralysis, the peculiar uncertainty of modern times, a paralysis that all since have experienced.

Obviously, we haven’t gotten our bearings.  We are far more adrift today on a stormy electronic sea where the analogical circle of life has been replaced by the digital, and “truths” like numbers click into place continuously to lead us in wrong, algorithm-controlled directions. The trap is almost closed.

Of course, Nietzsche did not have the Internet, but he lived at the dawn of the electric era, when space-time transformations were occurring at a rapid pace.  Inventions such as photography, the phonograph, the telephone, electricity, etc. were contracting space and time and a disembodied “reality” was being born.  With today’s Internet and digital screen life, the baby is full-grown and completely disembodied.  It does nothing but look at its image that is looking back into a lifeless void, whose lost gaze can’t figure out what it’s seeing.

Take, for example, the phonograph, invented by Thomas Edison in 1878.  If you could record a person’s voice, and if that person died, were you then listening to the voice of a living person or one who was dead?  If the person whose voice was recorded was alive and was miles away, you had also compressed earthly space. The phonograph suppressed absence, conjured ghosts, and seemed to overcome time and death as it captured the flow of time in sound.  It allowed a disembodied human voice to inhabit a machine, an early example of downloading.

“Two ruling ambitions in modern technology,” writes John Durham Peters in his wonderful book, Speaking into the Air, “appear in the phonograph: the creation of artificial life and the conjuring of the dead.”

Many people started to hear voices, and these people were not called deluded. Soon, with the arrival of cinema, they would see ghosts as well.  Today, speaking ghosts are everywhere, hiding in hand-held devices. It’s Halloween all year round as we are surrounded by electronic zombies in a screen culture.

This technological annihilation of space and time that was happening at a frenetic pace was the material background to Nietzsche’s thought.  His philosophical and epistemological analyses emerged from German intellectual life of his time as well, where theologians and philosophers were discovering that knowledge was relative and had to be understood in situ, i.e., within its historical and social place or context.

Without going into abstruse philosophical issues here, suffice it to say, Nietzsche was suggesting that not only was God dead because people killed him, but that knowledge was a fiction that changed over time and was a human construction.  All knowledge, not just science, had to be taken “as if” it were true.  This was a consoling mental trick but falsely reassuring, for most people could not accept this, since “knowledge” was a protection racket from pain and insanity. It still is. In other words, not only had people murdered God, but they had slain absolutes as well. This left them in the lurch, not knowing if what they knew and believed were really true, or sort of true – maybe, perhaps. The worm of uncertainty had entered modern thought through modern thought.

While the average person did not delve into these revolutionary ideas, they did, through the inventions that were entering their lives, and the news about Darwin, science, religion, etc., realize, however vaguely, that something very strange and dramatic was under way. Life was passing from substance to shadow because of human ingenuity.

It is similar to what so many feel today: that reality and truth are moving beyond their grasp as technological forces that they voluntarily embrace push everyday life towards some spectral denouement.  An inhuman, trans-human, on-line electronic life where everything is a parody of everything that preceded it, like an Andy Warhol copy of a copy of a Campbell’s soup can with a canned mocking laugh track that keeps repeating itself.  All this follows from the nineteenth century relativization of knowledge, or what at least was taken as such, for to say all knowledge is relative is an absolute statement.  That contradiction goes to the heart of our present dilemma.

This old feeling of lostness is perhaps best summarized in a few lines from Mathew Arnold’s 19th century poem, “Dover Beach”:

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth’s shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.

But that was then.  Today, the Joker’s sardonic laughter would suffice.


I am sitting outside as I write, sipping a glass of wine before dinner.  Although New England fall weather is approaching, a nasty mosquito is buzzing around my head.  I hear it.  I am in killer mode since these bastards love to bite me.  This is real life.  If I went into the house and connected to the Internet on the computer screen – news, social media, anything – I would be entering another dimension.  Screen life, not real life. The society of the spectacle. No real mosquitoes, no wine, no trees swaying in the evening breeze.

In his novel, The Sun Also Rises, written between Nietzsche’s time and now, Ernest Hemingway, a man who surely lived in the physical world, writes of how Robert Cohn, the boxing champion from Princeton University, wants Jake Barnes, the book’s protagonist, to take a trip with him to South America.  As they sit and talk in Paris, Barnes says no, and tells Cohn, “All countries look just like the moving pictures.”

Whether Hemingway was being ironic or not, or simply visionary, I don’t know.  For in the 1920s, before passports and widespread tourism, there were many places you could only see if you traveled to them and they would never appear in moving pictures, while today there is almost no place that is not available to view beforehand on the internet or television.  So why go anywhere if you’ve already seen it all on a screen? Why travel to nowhere or to where you have already been?  Déjà vu all over again, as Yogi Berra put it and everyone laughed.  Now the laugh is on us.


This is neither an argument nor a story.  It’s real.  I am trying to get my bearings in a disorienting situation. Call it a compass, a weather-vane, a prayer.  You can call me Al or Ishmael.  Call me crazy.  Perhaps this writing is just an “as if.”


About fifteen years ago, I was teaching at a college where most communication was done via email.  I was, as they say, out of the loop since I didn’t do email. I was often asked why I didn’t, and I would repeatedly reply, like Melville’s Bartleby, because “I prefer not to.”  Finally, in order to keep my job, I succumbed and with the laptop computer they provided me, I went “on-line.”  There were 6,954.7 emails in my in-box from the past three years.  In those three years, I had performed all my duties scrupulously and hadn’t missed a beat.  Someone showed me how to delete the emails, which I did without reading any, but I had entered the labyrinth. I went electronic.  My reality changed. I am still searching for Ariadne’s thread.


But I am not yet a machine and refuse the invitation to become one.  It’s a very insistent invitation, almost an order.  Neil Postman (Oh such a rich surname!) sums it up well in Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology:

The fundamental metaphorical message of the computer, in short, is that we are machines – thinking machines, to be sure, but machines nonetheless.  It is for this reason that the computer is the quintessential, incomparable, near perfect machine for Technopoly.  It subordinates the claims of our nature, our biology, our emotions, our spirituality.  The computer claims sovereignty over the whole range of human experience, and supports its claim by showing that it ‘thinks’ better than we can…John McCarthy, the inventor of the term ‘artificial intelligence’…claims that ‘even machines as simple as thermostats can be said to have beliefs…What is significant about this response is that it has redefined the meaning of the word ‘belief’ … rejects the view that humans have internal states of mind that are the foundation of belief and argues instead that ‘belief’ means only what someone or something does … rejects the idea that the mind is a biological phenomenon … In other words, what we have here is a case of metaphor gone mad.

Postman wrote that in 1992, before the computer and the internet became ubiquitous and longer before on-line living had become de rigueur – before it was being shoved down our throats as it is today under the cover of COVID-19.

There is little doubt that we are being pushed to embrace what Klaus Schwab, the Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), calls COVID-19:The Great Reset, that involves a total acceptance of the electronic, on-line life.  On-line learning, on-line news, on-line everything – only an idiot (from Greek, idiotes, a private person who pays not attention to public affairs) would fail to see what is being promoted.  And who controls the electronic life and internet?  Not you, not I, but the powers that be, the intelligence agencies and the power elites. Goodbye  body, goodbye blood – “I don’t think we should ever shake hands ever again, to be honest with you,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in support of human estrangement.

Peter Koenig, one of the most astute investigators of this propaganda effort, puts it this way:

The panacea of the future will be crowned by the Pearl of the Fourth Industrialization – Artificial intelligence (AI). It will be made possible by a 5G electromagnetic field, allowing the Internet of Things (IoT). Schwab and Malleret [Schwab’s co-author] won’t say, beware, there is opposition. 5G could still be blocked. The 5G existence and further development is necessary for surveillance and control of humanity, by digitizing everything, including human identity and money.

It will be so simple, no more cash, just electronic, digital money – that is way beyond the control of the owner, the truthful earner of the money, as it can be accessed by the Global Government and withheld and/or used for pressuring misbehaving citizens into obeying the norms imposed from above. You don’t behave according to our norms, no money to buy food, shelter and health services, we let you starve. No more travel. No more attending public events. You’ll be put gradually in your own solitary confinement. The dictatorial and tyrannical global commandeering by digital control of everything is the essence of the 4th Age of Industrialization – highly promoted by the WEF’s Great Reset.


Like everything, of course, this push to place life under the aegis of cyberspace has a history, one that deifies the machine and attempts to convince people that they too are machines without existential freedom.  Thus the ongoing meme pumped out for the past three decades has been that we are controlled by our brains and that the brain is a computer and vice versa. Brain research has received massive government funding. Drugs have been offered as the solution to every human problem. So-called diseases and disorders have been created through the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of  Mental Disorders (DSM) and matched to pharmaceutical drugs (or the revers) for scandalous profits. And the mind has been reduced to a figment of deluded  imaginations. People are machines; that’s the story, marvelous machines.  They have no freedom.

If one wishes an example of techno-fascism, there is one from the art world. Back in the 1920s and 1930s there was an art movement known as Futurism.  Its leader proponent was an Italian Fascist, friend of Mussolini, Filippo Tommaso Marinetti.  The futurists claimed that all life revolves around the machine, that the machine was god, that it was beyond human control and had to be obeyed.  They extolled war and speed and claimed that humans were no more significant than stones.  Patriotism, militarism, strength, method, and the kingdom of experts were their blueprint for a corporate fascist state.  The human eye and mind would be re-educated to automatically obey the machine’s dictates.

Now we have cyberspace, digital machines, and the internet, an exponential extension of the machine world of the 1930s and the rise of Mussolini, Fascism, and Hitler.  That this online world is being pushed as the new and future normal by trans-national elite forces should not be surprising.  If human communication becomes primarily digitally controlled on-line and on screens, those who control the machines will have achieved the most powerful means of mind control ever invented. That will be MKULTRA on a vast scale.  Surveillance will be complete.

Yes, there are places on the internet where truth is and will be told, such as this site where you are reading this; but as we can see from today’s growing censorship across the web, those power elites and intelligence forces who  control the companies that do their bidding will narrow the options for dissenting voices. Such censorship starts slowly, and then when one looks again, it is a fait accompli. The frog in the pan of slowly heating cold water never realizes it is being killed until it is too late. Free speech is now being strangled. Censorship is widespread.

The purpose of so much internet propaganda is to confuse, obsess, depress, and then repress the population. The overlords accomplish this by the “peculiar linking together of opposites – knowledge with ignorance, cynicism with fanaticism – [which] is one of the chief distinguishing marks of Oceanic society,” writes Orwell in Nineteen Eighty-Four.  “The official ideology abounds with contradictions even where there is no practical reason for them.”  One look into one’s life will suffice to see how the overlords have set people against each other.  It’s a classic tactic.  Divide and conquer. Trump vs. Biden, Democrats vs. Republicans, whites vs. blacks, liberals vs. conservatives. Pure mind games. Contradictions every day to create social disorientation.  Orwell describes Doublethink as follows:

Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.  The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories must be altered; he therefore knows he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself that reality is not violated.  The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt…To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies – all this is indispensably necessary…If one is to rule, and to continue ruling, one must be able to dislocate the sense of reality. [author’s emphasis]

Nietzsche said that along with the real world we have done away with the apparent as well.  Digital online life has accomplished that.  It has allowed the rulers – through the media who are the magicians who serve them – to create counterfeit news and doctored videos at will, to present diametrically opposed points of view within the same paragraph, and to push breaking news items so fast that no one half-way sane could keep up with their magic shows. Nietzsche obviously didn’t foresee this technology, but he sensed the madness that the relativity of knowledge and the technology of his day would usher in.


The popular 1990s term “Information Superhighway,” meaning the internet and all digital telecommunications, was the perfect term to describe this lunacy. Get on that highway and go as fast as you can while trying to catch the meaning of all the information flashing past you as you speed to nowhere.  For not only does censorship, propaganda, disinformation, mixed messages, and contradictions line the road you are traveling, but contextless information overload is so heavy that even if you were stopped in a traffic jam, there is too much information to comprehend.  And if you think this Superhighway is a freeway, think again, for the cost is high. No one puts out their hand and asks you to pay up; but the more you travel down this road you’ll notice you are missing a bit of flesh here and some blood there.  And without a speed pass, you are considered road kill.

To make matters much worse, they say we need 5G to go much faster.

Paul Virilio, who has devoted himself to the study of speed (dromology), puts it this way in Open Sky:

The speed of the new optoelectronic and electroacoustic milieu becomes the final void (the void of the quick), a vacuum that no longer depends on the interval between places or things and so on the world’s very extension, but on the interface of an instantaneous transmission of remote appearances, on a geographic and geometric retention in which all volume, all relief vanishes.


And yet I don’t have a simple answer to the internet dilemma. You are reading it on-line and I am posting it there.  It is very convenient and quick. And yet…and yet….

Can we just walk away from it?  Maybe.  Perhaps like those few who, in Ursula K. Le Guin’s excruciating story, “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas,” we may decide the price for our conveniences and so-called happiness is too high and that there are hidden victims that this techno-scientific “progress” creates beneath its veneer of efficiency.  Others, us, our children, all children, who are reaching out not for speed and machines, but for the human touch that the on-line propagandists hope to destroy.  In Le Guin’s story, the price nearly all the citizens of Omelas are willing to pay for their happiness and comfort is the imprisonment of a single child.  Perhaps we should consider what we are doing to all the world’s children and their futures.

My friend Gary recently sent me this letter.  I believe it sums up what many people feel. There is a vast hunger for reality and truth. The analog life. How to live it – the question hangs in the air as the artificial intelligence/digital controllers try to reduce us to machines.

Although apparently it isn’t clear if Twain ever said this, it’s still a great quote:  (“If you don’t read the newspaper, you’re uninformed.  If you do, you’re misinformed.”)  To which “amen” is the only appropriate response.

I continue to daily stay abreast of events through the web, and these days much of what passed for “progressive media” simply regurgitates the covid madness as if it had been delivered on stone tablets – rather than by the same MSM that lie to us daily about literally ANYTHING of any importance.

There are days I wonder “why” I continue to bother to follow the unfolding madness as if it made some “difference.”  I could certainly play guitar more, and I might even get it together to write a few pieces on the nature of our collective madness, for which I have studiously assembled copious notes.  I really don’t need any more information or examples – I think I have things covered on that front.

Instead I find myself daily doing the little dance we’re all familiar with – uncomfortable with being “uninformed” – yet at almost every turn finding myself being routinely – “misinformed” – and so having to sift through the endless debris to have any chance at developing any coherent understanding of the world.

So yes, I totally get the draw of just saying to hell with the internet.  After years of shifting through the endless propaganda operations our generation has been subject too, I have no doubt you and I see through most the nonsense for what it is before we even have the proof in hand.  Once the rose-colored glasses of ‘American exceptionalism’ are off, one can almost sense and see through the lies in real time even as they are being uttered.

Reading Gary’s words reminded me of those of the Trappist monk Thomas Merton’s definition of the Unspeakable:

It is the void that contradicts everything that is spoken even before the words are said, the void that gets into the language of public and official declarations at the very moment when they are pronounced, and makes them ring dead with the hollowness of the abyss.  It is the void out of which Eichmann drew the punctilious exactitude of his obedience…

Yes, real time, real life – as we do our little dances.

Can we do our little dances and preserve reality?  I’m not sure.

The post The End of Reality? first appeared on Dissident Voice.

The Fatal Attractions of Techno-Fascism

Those who are serious in ridiculous matters will be ridiculous in serious matters.

— Cato the Elder, (Marcus Porcius Cato, 234 BC – 149 BC)

The enduring appeal of fascism is that it requires so little from us… so little independent thought; just our basic belief and adherence to a limited set of popularly-shared directives and narratives that once fully accepted, relieve us of the need to address stubborn questions or to fret over subtle differences of opinion and feeling. Continual propaganda is there to reassure us that we are complete, that we know all that is important to know — that we are rational, pragmatic and moral… that the science has been settled and that we are all a part of something historic.

Such a surrender to constricted narratives cuts across all classes and income brackets. Neither the most educated nor the least uneducated retain any special advantage in the face of powerful consensus-shaping propaganda.

PROPAGANDA is, of course, the life-blood of authoritarian control. Maintaining the economic, governmental and scientific frameworks of a modern technocratic “operating system” would be impossible without propaganda’s divisive assault. When truth is seen as a liability to power, it must always be disallowed, with all instances of it effectively penalized.

Radio, television, the Internet and their constant enabler, popular “science” — operate today as their own religions, reliant for their success upon the unquestioning devotion of the masses. The currency that we use to pay for admission to the electronic spectacle is our attention, and in such hyper-mediated times as these, those charges mount up exponentially, until we generally find ourselves at some point, broke and spiritually exhausted by soul-crushing denial and disconnection.

The DNA of modern propaganda is full of equal parts:  hatred, fear, ambition and duplicity. From Edward Bernays in the post WWI era, often referred to as the father of public relations, to Dr. Goebbels, the Nazi Reich Minister of Propaganda, whose hugely successful disinformation programs served as the model for the world’s political and economic leaders in the post-war era. The post-WWII era saw the founding of the CIA in 1947 at the golden dawn of full-spectrum electronic media. Propaganda in the intervening 70 years has proven SO successful at directing public opinion, that even today, only a small percentage of people fully realize just how ongoing, vast and wide-spread its subversive effects are.

If the public truly understood the extent of these control agendas, they might balk, but alas, people have consistently shown themselves incapable of standing up to it in any significant way.

Commercial media, of course, focuses on those products, stories and personalities they are paid to propagate;  i.e., those which support the financial and ideological agendas of their owners who, without exception, hold key positions in the larger global ruling oligarchy.

A central chapter in the propagandist’s bible is to simply leave unexplored stories that they do not have approval to manage and control. Such sins of omission are essential to keeping the mass of believers unperturbed by the poisonous vagaries cut into their daily news fix.

If an individual were to insist upon learning more about any of these less-discussed stories, they might come to see that while an abundance of corroborating facts is readily available, and very often hiding in plain sight, most people simply do not WANT to know, think or talk about those truths that diverge from those accepted by the majority of their peers. For the masses, such departures from the status quo initiate bouts of cognitive dissonance that can trigger literal pain and disorientation, which further serves to keep people docile and compliant to the dictates of the media.

As McLuhan said, “Only the small secrets need to be protected. The large ones are kept secret by public incredulity.”

Perhaps, the grandest illusion of all, one that must be maintained at all costs, is that both the world and the stories we tell of it, should be made to appear as though they arise RANDOMLY. The media’s coverage of events and the comments of experts must always appear entirely absent any suggestion of fraudulent manipulation.

In the terminology of the media, news must always be “breaking!” — even though in reality, we know the news is highly scripted such that it more closely resembles a cooking show, where ingredients are chopped and sliced before-hand, after which they are prepped and served up live on camera in ways designed to keep the public fixated on the comforting hash-slinging and enticingly-scripted recipes.

Technocratic-Fascism, the advanced fusion of the transnational technology-dominated corporatocracy with the authoritarian global surveillance state, prods the public into believing that they are privy to some “secret” knowledge. Witness the magical left’s lockstep belief in the absolute villainy of Donald Trump, or the magical right’s equally absolute belief in Trump as a self-sacrificing national hero.

Clearly, both parties to this progressive erosion of human freedoms need each other to close the circuit and seal the deal. Overwhelming greed on the part of the oligarchs for profit and control necessitates that their true motives remain hidden and obfuscated in a fog of weaponized storytelling.

So many fraudulent methods underscore the abiding value of BULLSHIT, do they not? Bullshit effectively misleads without upsetting the natural order of things or tearing apart the fabric of credibility. Nothing can stand in the way of approved messaging or the drive for constant growth which have all along been the root justifications for such elaborate systems of deception.

This is another aspect of what makes technocratic-fascism so irresistible:  a presumption that by gaining more and more knowledge about us, it comes to knows us better than we know ourselves. If we were to know ourselves better, then we would not be so easily seduced by such obvious falsehoods. Since we don’t, the “owners” of our data are freed to keep up the constant barrage of distortions.

If, for example, we did not so easily obey and swallow whole their messaging, we might soon enough notice the many contradictions that we are instructed exist, say, between the Covid monster and the daily vaporous disease statistics, or between maskers and non-maskers, between vaxxers and anti-vaxxers, between crushing economic destruction and our mewling need for safety, between the lunatic left and the lunatic right, between black and whites, between males and females… between one piece of orthogonal bullshit and another equally opposing piece.

ALL of these dichotomies are at some fundamental level necessary, at the same time they are FALSE — each constructed by skilled media professionals and deployed to overwhelm our critical thinking and that of millions of others so as to keep us from seeing what’s really going on in the darkly-veiled background.

In such remarkably cost-effective ways, human energy and intelligence are depleted, transforming us into confused and easily-controllable “lab rats.” This further puts us at risk of being forcibly cut off from each other, lest we suddenly experience ourselves as connected, interdependent and sovereign beings. If something like THAT were to happen, the driving agendas of big business, global governance and the shadow state to keep us marching in lockstep towards a more divided and disempowered future, might quickly disintegrate.

It is in such states of debilitation that one “targeted” demographic subset gets easily pitted against another; all herded into wicked mental traps with one side thinking one thing, while the other side thinks something else — such that half of us are whipped into hatred of the other half that then hates the other right back.

At this point, and after so many years of unqualified victories for those corporations and states that are the primary beneficiaries of the propaganda industry, the pathetic realization is that propaganda doesn’t even NEED to be that engaging anymore. Confident that they have the situation (and the public) in tow, the purveyors of propaganda save a ton of expense by just being repeatedly sensational, confrontational and redundant in their narratives.

Once people have learned to carry on absent the need for verifiable truth, or without the ability to discern authentic and honest voices from deceitful and manipulative ones, we gradually lose our interest in so-called “truth” altogether, preferring instead to keep splashing about in the shallow pools of unsubstantiated speculation, addictive voyeurism, presumptuous judgments and lazy groupthink opinion-shaping.

Let’s be honest… the only people who might actually CARE what any of us think about the blaring big topics of the day (masks, vaccines, climate change or Black Lives Matter, etc.) are other equally thin-skinned propaganda junkies, who still believe that the government cares about them and that the mainstream media is telling them the truth. 

In the face of such daily capitulations and especially as a result of the controlled-demolition of the world brought on by the Covid lockdown, a growing number of people have “opted out” — given up on the media bullshit and are instead turning their attention to quickly figuring out how to thrive and to reconnect energetically with others — and with truths that can only exist OUTSIDE the reach of the propaganda’s manufactured “spectacle.”

The media, of course, with their sophisticated surveillance tracking (and now contact-tracing) tools knows full well when there is an uptick in negative reactions to their toxic narratives, but since it is simultaneously aware that it is after all pushing nothing but sugar-water bullshit, it is left with little choice but to double-down and open the spigots even wider and so keep ramming even more bullshit at us.

The flood of distractions come at us so fast and so hard now as to leave us staggering under the weight of it all, lurching around like decapitated chickens desperately trying to win the approval of our peers by looking like we are at least doing the only “acceptable” thing.

Arriving at this frenzied point of screwball dissolution is the essential endgame of propaganda, in that it locks us into its agenda, at the same time it demands that we INSIST we are making these choices of our own FREE WILL!

To get us to that point, though, they must keep us in a certifiable TIZZY; constantly preoccupied, agitated, offended, and driven to attacking each other and defending ourselves against all threats, both real and imagined. The more they can get us ensnared in mind-numbing scandals and outrages, the less energy and attention will be left to notice the deeper, more manipulative and anti-human agendas of techno-fascism.

Mid-20th Century fascism was woefully limited in its technological capacities and in what concealed knowledge it could extract from its victims… and yet somehow it still proved brilliantly effective. The new technocratic-fascism arrives at the new golden dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) ready to mine the population for all the bio-capital commodification it can. Those tech giants who can invent the most efficient and ingenious means of converting human confusion, poverty, crime, ignorance and illness into “impact” investments and “human capital” markets will take their place among the prior generations’ titans of technology.

Once you come to an appreciation for the sheer SCALE of this ongoing and unlimited disinformation WAR on us, it grows a bit easier to understand why so few are able to escape the media’s influence. Oh, for a while perhaps, we might rise above it… but eventually, we all get pulled back down into the muck. Even if you kill your TV, unplug yourself from your media feeds, turn off the Wi-Fi and switch to a flip-phone, each of us, at some point, will relapse and fall off the wagon.

This is because propaganda is not just about what’s presented to us in the news or in the media. It’s even more importantly about our inability to escape the consensual layers of SOCIAL HALLUCINATION that are created and shared across all of society, and which make it difficult for any of us to function socially, absent these commonly shared reference points and signals that we have convinced ourselves are required in order to manage our anxiety, confusion and isolation, which ironically, are exactly what propaganda has always sought to cultivate.

Would that there was one sure-fire way to break propaganda’s voodoo spell over us. There isn’t. I’m not even sure how to do that for myself, or how I can best avoid falling prey to it again, just as I and most of us have done for the great majority of our lives.

What seems obvious to me now is that propaganda post-Covid, is squarely in the service of transhumanist-centered technology — so insidiously forceful that our ability to experience that uniquely human portion of our soul, is rapidly dissolving away. That there is no universal UPROAR in response to these draconian tactics, serves as proof of the plan’s effectiveness.

The effect of all this leaves us vulnerable to this planned “spiritual” disease; and cluelessly susceptible to even harsher controls from those diabolical plutocratic forces that manage the social narratives that keep us subservient to their gospel of untruths. Their continued success  necessitates their constant need to appear as something they are not.

Such perfidy is perfectly exemplified in the character of BILL GATES, who working with his Bain and Co. consultant handlers and investment managers (who had previously managed the Iraq War for Dick Cheney) create these elaborate biopharma – biocapital – vaccine – public health – synthetic food – edutech tyrannical narratives and investment pyramids that are then fed to the media and Wall Street, who repackage and serve them to the public as “beneficial” (B-Corp) financial technology instruments, which generate criminal levels of profit while at the same time they portray instigators and beneficiaries like Mr. Gates as altruistic philanthropists and “lord protectors” of the public. I am continually amazed at how many very smart people fall for this, even though Gates’ own history makes perfectly clear that he is nothing of the sort.

NOT seeing just how obvious and laughable propaganda campaigns have become in this one-size fits all era, leaves us painfully vulnerable and primed to be further overwhelmed by more of the same.

The range of today’s “master plans” of disinformation and larceny, like the UN’s “Agenda 21”, the World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” and the coming return of the pillaging “Green New Deal” are unparalleled in their scope and complexity compared to quainter (and less quantified) master plans of the past.

Looking back on the 1950’s and 60’s, when many of these grandiose plans for centralized and technocratic control were first being imagined, believing in the “American Dream” narrative and being part of America’s growing middle-class was actually a pretty sweet deal. It is in recalling a return to such bucolic and “normal” times that right up to the present form the back-story of every politician’s hollow campaign promises.

Desperation is the raw material of drastic change. Only those who can leave behind everything they have ever believed in, can hope to escape.

— William S. Burroughs, The Western Lands, Viking Press, 1987

Looking around at our world, we can see that the reach and authority of the transnational global capitalists who run the world’s nation-sized casinos has been cemented. All systems are now in place, up and running LIVE on that criminal syndicate’s vast web of networks. Each one of us has by now been targeted by them for surveillance and financialization — just as “nature” has, just as “disease” has, just as “education” has, just as “social justice” has, just as “poverty” has, just as “identity” has — just as nearly everything will eventually.

The “A.I. control grids” are all active and expanding. The technocratic agendas are fully functional and activated. (The March lockdown would never have happened had the critical technology not been in place.) We have been gradually “shepherded” by propaganda and not too subtle psychological torture techniques, just as we have also been physically compromised by toxins in the geoengineered air and water, by damaging electromagnetic frequency radiation, by the release of nano-particulates and artificial biology inside our bodies (either by way of inhalation or injection) which, when governed by 5G millimeter wave frequencies, will allow for remote alteration of our very DNA under the “persistent” control of A.I., which will speed the process of transmuting us into commodities, into plunderable assets, into digitally-regulated and genetically modified “livestock.”

Sadly, this is where decades of our constant acquiescence to propaganda and institutional hypnosis has brought us… bent over, grabbing our ankles and bracing for the next “BIG ONE.”

I recall as a kid, convinced that the evil genius of Hitler and Nazism had to do with him magically stealing the souls of his people and transforming these decent German people into BEASTS, possessed by demons, as if in a dark fairy tale… into something less than human.

We know that once we begin to regard others as LESS than us… as something OTHER than us, it is only a short step to unleashing our vengeance upon them, right up to and past the point of violence and genocide. Assurances that humanity has advanced beyond such descents into barbarism are just more bullshit.

Needless to say, these very same psychological imperatives are everywhere apparent in today’s propaganda; in how we are instructed to regard the Chinese, Russians, Muslims, white supremacist Trumpers, deluded depraved liberals, defective racists, misogynist sexists and inflamed “face-ists” (with their scowling disdain for anyone who questions the dogma of “e-mask-ulation.”)

Same as it ever was, you might say, but as we approach the eagerly anticipated “Singularity” with its inexorable convergence of man and machine, how will the media respond? How will they reframe Huxley’s predicted “scientific dictatorship?” In such a reassessment, how might the focus of future propaganda shift to maintain its unchallenged dominance?

I expect it will change-up the pitch and tell us that THIS time, things will be different. This time won’t be like last time. No, this time, things will have changed, so that we will no longer be “brainwashed” by the media as we were before. No, when the inevitable big change happens to us, it will not be like that. It will rather be an ascension. In it we will be transformed into advanced independent humans augmented by perfectly apportioned combinations of technology, science and engineering.

Our “designer” DNA will be carefully crafted by brilliant doctors and scientists to enhance only the “preferred” qualities in their human subjects, and under their wise direction, we will gladly do as we are told. For so great a future, we will willingly offer our support and so grow accustomed to our new life, lest we become like those poor unfortunate souls, so lost in their unreason, that they cannot fully appreciate the wisdom that derives from enthusiastically embracing PROGRESS.

In our leaders inspired and time-tested plans, we will, of course, have every convenience at our fingertips, such that doors will magically open when we approach. We will be able to call forth all manner of sights, sounds and data with the blink of an eye. We will be as supermen.

Our definitions of what is valuable and what is not will fluidly shift to suit changing circumstances. We will see ourselves as the epitome of modernity and the envy of the world… just as we have always been. We will be as American as our multi-racial forefathers, even though they lived in unenlightened times… long before today’s great social justice transformation allowed us, their proud descendants, to wake each day into this glistening and rapturous world.

In such an existence, when we ask ourselves what we might be grateful for, we will no longer need to struggle for an answer. We will know exactly what is good, true and beautiful and we will commit ourselves to those lofty ideals each and every day, and to the necessary task of eliminating all those who might oppose us in our pursuit of this best of all possible futures.

Therein too. and most mercilessly, resides the most fatal attraction of techno-fascism.