Category Archives: United Nations

Nuremberg Trial: 75 years Ago and What it Means Today

On Saturday 21 November 2020 Russia celebrated the 75th Anniversary of the beginning of the Nuremberg Trials which started on 20 November 1945 and lasted almost a year, until 1 October 1946. The Tribunal was given the task of trying and judging 24 of the most atrocious political and military leaders of the Third Reich.

For this unique celebration – so we shall never forget – Russian leaders and people of the Arts and History organized a Special Performance of Giuseppe Verdi’s “Requiem” at Moscow’s Helikon Opera Theatre. Daniel Hawkins, from RT, introduced this extraordinary event, as a journey through history, a journey through life and death, when some of – at that time – most genocidal people in history had to answer for their crimes.

This opera event was prepared for more than a year and was first performed in January 2020 for the Holocaust victims and the victims of the Nazi concentration camps in Leningrad. The Nuremberg Trials were conducted by an International Military Tribunal. They resulted in 12 death sentences.

The idea of the “Requiem” performance is “not just to appeal to emotions, but to reason. Because if we fail to learn from history, the tragedy could be repeated.”

This is precisely what Sergei Novikov, head of the (Russian) presidential directorate for social projects, intimidated. He says, “Despite of what we have seen happening 75 years ago – we do not seem to have learned a lesson. Today we seem to go down the same road, which is frightening.”

The musical performance interplays with theatrical realism – so memories are awake and moving – better than a museum. The educational impact of this celebration of remembrance is extremely important especially for the young people, who do not remember these events, but with this first-class performance, they may learn a crucial lesson,  a lesson hardly talked about in history books and even less so in the west.

If we compare what has happened then – 75 years ago – actually the anti-Jewish demonstration in Berlin, known as Kristallnacht, on 9 and 10 November 1938, effectively the beginning of WWII, and look at today’s extremism in Europe, Germany, France, Austria, Belgium, we know that we are not far from a tyranny we knew as “Nationalsozialismus”, a political Nazi-concept of the late 1930s and up to mid-1940s, that today can best be compared with extreme neoliberalism and merciless oppression of peoples’ rights by police and military.

In fact, we may be steps ahead of what Hitler and his crime and war cabinet had done, but again, today, like then, we are blind to it. There may be a time when we can no longer move, when we are in constant lockdown, masked with dismembered faces, so to speak, kept away from each other under the pretext of social distancing so that we cannot communicate with each other, all for reasons of public health, for the “good intentions” of our governments to protect us from an evil virus – the corona virus.

Today, this oppression is the result of a long-term plan by a small elite to implement The Great Reset (Klaus Schwab, WEF, July 2020).

*****

There is, of course, a good reason, why Moscow wants the world to remember what WWII meant and how eventually Nazi-Germany was defeated – yes, largely if not solely by enormous sacrifices of the Soviet Union. Some 25 to 30 million USSR soldiers and Soviet citizens had left their lives for salvaging Europe – and possibly the world – from an all invading fascism.

The United States, nominally an ally of the Soviet Union, had clandestinely funded the Third Reich’s war against the Soviet Union. One of the key purposes for the US getting “involved” in WWII, other than defeating the British Empire, was to defeat their arch-enemy, communist Soviet Union. The Rockefellers funded Hitler’s war machine by providing them with hydrocarbons, with petrol, the energy that drove the war.

On the other hand, the Federal Reserve (FED), via the Bank for International Settlement (BIS) – the pyramid tower still omni-present in Basle, Switzerland, near the German border – transferred gigantic monetary resources to the Reichsbank (at that time Hitler’s equivalent of a German Central Bank)

Verdi’s Requiem Performance in Moscow on 21 November is important to go back in history and open the “memory books” in front of our eyes. It is even more important, as we see the trend of fascism taking over the entire European continent and possibly also the United States.

Europe basically ignores the importance of the 75th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials which still, as of this date, provides precedents for international war crimes – except, these precedents are miserably ignored.  If not, we would have multiple repeats of Nuremberg in our days and age with European and US leaders (sic) in “retirement’ but still with power. Our dystopian western world is beset by war criminals even to the point where they blackmail judges of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, not to touch their – the European and US – war crimes, or else…

That’s where we have arrived.

Since we are going back to the times when WWII and Nuremberg happened, we should take the opportunity to also look at the Big Picture, one that may be at the root of this new wave of fascism invading Europe. It is, in essence, a health dictatorship; it has become a Health Martial Law. Many countries have ratified, quietly, or rammed it through Parliament without the public at large noticing – a law allowing them switching from everyday life to an emergency situation; i.e., (health) Martial Law.

The Big Picture, though, is a diabolical plan of eugenics. Yes, it’s a term nobody wants to use, but it must be said, because it’s one of the fundamental principles that lies in all that is planned, the 2010 Rockefeller Report and the extremely important WHO Report “A World at Risk” – Annual Report on Global Preparedness for Health Emergencies, by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board – GPMB (September 2019).

Key members of this Monitoring Board include the World Bank, IMF, CDC and many more influential players, who have been concocting the “Preparedness” for a new epidemic since at least 2016, when the World Bank set up a special “Health Emergency Fund” to face the “next pandemic”.

Also, part of the SARS-Cov-2 preparedness and planned outbreak, was Event 201 (18 October 2019, NYC, sponsored by Gates, the WEF, and the Johns Hopkins School for Medicine (Rockefeller created and funded), which simulated the outbreak of a SARS-Cov-2 virus which curiously happened a few weeks later. The “outbreak” was actually officially announced on the dot of the beginning of the Decade 2020.

The Big Picture scheme also includes as an aftermath to covid, The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab, WEF, July 2020), a plan to implement the 4th Industrial Revolution and the enslavement of the remaining population. The Rockefellers and Bill Gates, Kissinger and many more  have nurtured the idea of massively reducing the world population for at least the last 70 years.

Ever since the Rockefellers espoused the concept of the “Bilderberger Society” (a parallel organization to the WEF (World Economic Forum), with overlapping and an ever-moving memberships) their one and only continuous “project” was a selective population reduction. And they actually never made it a secret. See Bill Gates TedTalk in February 2010 – just about the time when the infamous 2010 Rockefeller Report was issued, the one that has us now in “lockstep” following all the rules and regulations, issued by WHO and supported by the entire UN system .

Why then was the eugenics agenda never seriously picked up by the mainstream, by the public at large? – Possibly, because nobody can even imagine people so evil – or allow me to call them non-humans – to actually want to make this reality. But these non-humanoids do exist. How they infiltrated themselves into human society is a mystery.

By the way, have you ever seen Bill Gates – with his obnoxious grin – wearing a mask? Or the Rockefellers, Kissingers, et al?  How come they are always spared from this deadly virus, SARS-Cov-2?  How come they get very old, but appear to be always in good health? What kind of life elixir are they using?

Back to the Eugenists. To implement such a massive plan on a worldwide scale, one needs a uniform approach to world health. In 1948, just a couple of years after the Nuremberg trials started, where war criminals like the Rockefellers should also have been indicted for supplying the enemy (German Nazis) with energy to drive their (anti-Soviet) war machine – back then, in 1948, Rockefeller created WHO, the World Health Organization.

The philanthropic Rockefeller Foundation (RF) has marked the field of health like no other organization. The oil magnate, John D. Rockefeller “to promote the well-being of mankind throughout the world.” Hence, the RF created and provided the original funding to set up WHO in 1948. On 7 April 1948, WHO inherited the mandate and resources of its predecessor, the Health Organization, which had been an agency of the League of Nations. Twenty-six (out of then 58) UN members ratified WHO as a UN agency under the UN Constitution.

Once you have “Global Health” under one roof, the WHO, funded primarily by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the pharmaceutical industries (predominantly GAVI – Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization – also created by Bill Gates in 2000) and you also have the predominant donor, Bill Gates, an obsessed vaxxer (and eugenist) without any medical training, choose WHO’s Director General – Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a buddy of Gates and former Board Member of GAVI – it is relatively easy to make the foundation of WHO’s health policies based on vaccination.

That’s what we see today. As we have heard from Gates’ TedTalk (2010 see above), vaccination seems to lend itself perfectly to reduce the world population. It has the further advantage, that if anything goes “wrong” – no vaccine company can be held responsible, let alone being sued. For example, if people get seriously ill or die from the vaccinations – which would not be a surprise, after the Covid-19 are planned to be administered in warp speed – the vaccine pharmaceuticals cannot be sued.

In fact, vaccine companies do not bear any liability risk. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34), was signed into law by US President Ronald Reagan on November 14, 1986. NCVIA’s purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury, since lawsuits led many manufacturers to stop producing the vaccines, a lame argument, but that shows once more the lobbying power the pharma industry commands.

That’s where we stand today. Any sinister vaccination agenda, no matter how hurtful to the public, is home free. Today we are at this crucial point of massive forced vaccination. Many governments; i.e., UK’s Boris Johnson and Australia’s Scott Morrison, have already advanced the idea of a vaccination-pass. Without it you are banned from flying and from just about every public event. That’s promising.

And one might ask what does that have to with public health?  What is the real agenda behind it?

Again, returning to the Nuremberg Trials, aren’t we in the midst of a world tyranny to which all 193 UN member countries subscribed, or were coerced into – a tyranny that has already been genocidal, in as much as it destroyed the world economy, creating countless bankruptcies, unemployment – untold poverty and misery and death, and now a potentially genocidal massive vaccination campaign, the effects of it might be death in the medium to long term, but “untraceable”, or too late by the time the cause is discovered.

A world tyranny inflicted by all 193 UN member countries – whatever their motivation – all these governments and the heads of WHO and the entire UN system belongs before a new Nuremburg-type Tribunal – where the same legal principal would be applied as 75 years ago in 1945.

Who says this will not happen? We can make it happen. We, the People, are the 99.99%.  They are only 0.01 %. We have the power to resist – and we will prevail.

The post Nuremberg Trial: 75 years Ago and What it Means Today first appeared on Dissident Voice.

Moving Past Apartheid: One-State is not Ideal Justice, but It is Just and Possible

Once again, Europe’s top diplomats expressed their ‘deep concern’ regarding Israel’s ongoing illegal settlement expansion, again evoking the maxim that Israeli actions “threaten the viability of the two-state solution”.

This position was communicated by EU Foreign Affairs Chief, Josep Borrell, on November 19, during a video-conference with Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister, Riyad al-Maliki.

All Israeli settlements are illegal under international law and should be rejected in words and action, regardless of whether they pose a threat to the defunct two-state solution or not.

Aside from the fact that Europe’s ‘deep concern’ is almost never followed with any substantive action, articulating a legal and moral stance in the context of imaginary solutions is particularly meaningless.

The question, then, is: “Why does the West continue to use the two-state solution as its political parameter for a resolution to the Israeli occupation of Palestine while, at the same time, failing to take any meaningful measure to ensure its implementation?”

The answer lies, partly, in the fact that the two-state solution was never devised for implementation, to begin with.  Like the “peace process” and other pretenses, it aimed to promote, among Palestinians and Arabs, the idea that there is a goal worth striving for, despite it being unattainable.

However, even that goal was, itself, conditioned on a set of demands that were unrealistic at the outset. Historically, Palestinians have had to renounce violence (their armed resistance to Israel’s military occupation), consent to various UN resolutions (even if Israel still rejects those resolutions), accept Israel’s “right” to exist as a Jewish state, and so on. That yet-to-be-established Palestinian State was also meant to be demilitarized, divided between the West Bank and Gaza, but excluding most of occupied East Jerusalem.

Yet, while warnings that a two-state solution possibility is disintegrating, few bothered to try to understand the reality from a Palestinian perspective. Fed up with the illusions of their own failed leadership, according to a recent poll, two-thirds of Palestinians now agree that a two-state solution is not possible.

Even the claim that a two-state solution is necessary, at least as a precursor to a permanent one-state solution, is absurd. This argument places yet more obstacles before the Palestinian quest for freedom and rights. If the two-state solution was ever feasible, it would have been achieved when all parties, at least publicly, championed it. Now, the Americans are no longer committed to it and the Israelis have moved past it into whole new territories, plotting the illegal annexation and permanent occupation of Palestine.

The undeniable truth is that millions of Palestinian Arabs (Muslims and Christians) and Israeli Jews are living between the Jordan River and the Sea. They are already walking on the same earth and drinking the same water, but not as equals. While Israeli Jews represent the privileged, Palestinians are oppressed, caged in behind walls and treated as inferior. To sustain Israeli Jewish privilege as long as possible, Israel uses violence, employs discriminatory laws and, as Professor Ilan Pappe calls it, ‘incremental genocide’ against Palestinians.

A one-state solution aims to challenge Israeli Jewish privilege, replacing the current racist, apartheid regime with a democratic, equitable, and representative political system that guarantees the rights for all peoples and all faiths, as in any other democratic governance anywhere in the world.

For that to take place, no shortcuts are required and no further illusions about two states are necessary.

For many years, we have linked our struggle for Palestinian freedom with the concept of justice, as in ‘no justice no peace’, ‘justice for Palestine’, and so on. So, it is befitting to ask the question, is the one-state solution a just one?

Perfect justice is not attainable because history cannot be erased. No truly just solution can be achieved when generations of Palestinians have already died as refugees without their freedom or ever going back to their homes. Nevertheless, allowing injustice to perpetuate because ideal justice cannot be obtained is also unfair.

For years, many of us have advocated a one-state as the most natural outcome of terribly unjust historical circumstances. However, I – and I know of other Palestinian intellectuals, as well – have refrained from making that a cause celèbre, simply because I believe that any initiatives regarding the future of the Palestinian people must be championed by the Palestinian people themselves. This is necessary to prevent the kind of cliquism and, as Antonio Gramsci called it, intellectualism, that wrought Oslo and all of its ills.

Now that public opinion in Palestine is shifting, mainly against the two-state solution, but also, though gradually, in favor of a one-state, one is able to publicly take this stance as well. We should support the one democratic state because Palestinians in Palestine itself are increasingly advocating such a rightful and natural demand. I believe it is only a matter of time before equal rights within a one-state paradigm become the common cause of all Palestinians.

Advocating dead ‘solutions’, as the Palestinian Authority, the EU and others continue to do, is a waste of precious time and effort. All attention should now focus on helping Palestinians obtain their rights, including the Right of Return for Palestinian refugees and holding Israel morally, politically and legally accountable for failing to respect international law.

Living as equals in one state that demolishes all walls, ends all sieges and breaks all barriers is one of these fundamental rights that should not be up for negotiations.

The post Moving Past Apartheid: One-State is not Ideal Justice, but It is Just and Possible first appeared on Dissident Voice.

The Emperor Has No Clothes

I reviewed Sra. Michelle Bachelet’s Report on Venezuela, and was quite outraged at her lack of consideration and due diligence. I will, in a moment, tell everyone why this report needs to be trashed, but even before that, I think I should mention two systemic flaws about this type of reporting regardless of which country it is written for.

First

The Report treats Venezuela as an isolated entity, along with other entities, such as the United States, Colombia,… floating in separate air space, without impacting or being impacted by any other country, in any way, shape, or form.

Everyone knows, however, that the truth is otherwise, that the funds the United States government has allocated to bring down the Maduro Bolivarian Government are probably more than some small countries’ annual budget, and that the United States’ sanctions to punish the Venezuelan people and deprive them of food, medicine, and fuel amount to no less than crimes against humanity. That clearly tells me that Venezuela is on earth and not in space, and both its government and its people are greatly impacted by the actions of other countries, and in particular the United States. It also, in my mind, invalidates the entire UN Report, but it takes spine, and we all know that Sra. Bachelet would not remain in office long if she attempted to produce one such report that takes into consideration all players influencing Venezuela and its people’s rights.

In this report, there is no mention of international criminals, such as Elliot Abrams (what a shame), who have been convicted in his own country and is now running loose, being employed by the Trump Administration to bring death and horror upon the people of Venezuela, as they did in El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala,… CAN A TRUE HUMAN RIGHTS OBSERVER REALLY REMAIN SILENT ON THESE ISSUES?

Second

The expression “Political Prisoner” is loosely defined and even more loosely utilized. A political prisoner is someone who has been imprisoned or subjected to other restrictions by the State, because of his beliefs, party affiliations, or peaceful protest. Such description is generally accepted by most, but loosely used to include violent opposition as well. As Fidel Castro would often ask: “Don’t we have the right to defend ourselves?” This issue is seldom addressed by ‘human rights’ organizations. Many people who are presented as political prisoners are often violent individuals of no independent character who are funded by the United States government or private individuals, somehow tied to the US government. Unless the HR report presents a list of the individuals, their alleged crimes against the State, and their investigated claims, one can never be certain if they can be categorized as political prisoners.

In addition, repressive actions by ‘friendly governments’ are oftentimes ignored whereas ‘unfriendly governments’ are placed under constant scrutiny. As an example, how can we put Venezuela under a magnifying glass when daily crimes by the repressive State in Saudi Arabia are often ignored? In my opinion, those who place the Bolivarian State right next to the Saudi Arabian Dictatorship must be mentally deranged.

The report is all unproven innuendos and play-with-words. It keeps referencing itself so many times that one starts wondering where the meat is. What is the real content? Where are the emperor’s clothes?

And Now For the Meat

The first paragraph  (graves vulneraciones)… que se han documentado en el pais. (POR FAVOR, QUE SON ESTAS?)

Where are your research data?

So where is the meat?

The Seventh and Eighth Paragraphs

Sra. Bachelet admits that the Bolivarian government announced its commitment to cooperate with her men to deal with the various themes. “The issue is complicated,” claims Sra. Bachelet. Why? The Venezuela government’s cooperation, which is pretty significant, is mentioned in a one-sentence blurb, perhaps intended to imply the Bolivarian government’s admission of its guilt which would be not true.

The next paragraph (one of very few statistics) refers to 66 deaths, 52 of them allegedly inflicted by Security Forces. What about the other 14? Venezuelan opposition is notorious for miscategorizing pro-government deaths as its own, and many opposition members walk around armed. Is there any verification of such claims?

Speaking of efficiency, there are, of course, many government functions that could be done better and much more efficiently if more funds were available, and the country’s wealth wasn’t robbed so much by the United States and the European Union countries, such as the case of the $2 billion British robbery of Venezuelan gold. Sra. Bachelet, how many more kids could receive milk and other alimentation if the stolen gold could be handed over to the constitutional government of Venezuela?

Does honesty count any more in world politics?

The post The Emperor Has No Clothes first appeared on Dissident Voice.

Toward Global Sharing

Since the onset of the global pandemic, the idea of a universal basic income has rightly received high-level political attention—not only within individual countries (such as here in the UK where it was at least debated by Parliament back in March), but also on the international level as endorsed by the United Nations. Never has there been such a need for providing an immediate, guaranteed, unconditional income to the world’s poorest people. The pandemic has dramatically busted the myth that governments cannot afford to implement radical pro-social investments—the issue is one of political will, not cost.

The key question is whether it is politically realistic to expect governments to implement an alternative socioeconomic paradigm, with a UBI at its heart. In the midst of deepening crises—extreme inequality, unbridled commercialization, climate change, militarization, authoritarian populism—can we expect establishment politicians to voluntarily “advance a progressive transition from rentier capitalism to a more just, ethical, and ecological economy”? As we know, the existing conditions of economic globalization lead to a race to the bottom in labor, tax and environmental regulation that militates against the financing of a strong safety net and universal social policies—let alone a generous basic income for all citizens. However much we need a new income distribution system for the twenty-first century, the overall trends are increasingly moving in the wrong direction.

For these reasons, a huge amount of public support is needed behind the UBI vision if it is to stand a chance of being introduced as a transformative policy. If a UBI is to meet its egalitarian promises, it is also critical that public sympathy is based on the right altruistic motivation — to ensure, first and foremost, that everyone has “the right to live.” But considering the vast scale of the humanitarian crisis today, is it premature to advocate for a visionary UBI solution while millions of people subsist in life-threatening conditions of poverty?

It is impossible to adequately confront this international emergency until enough ordinary people of goodwill embrace the United Nations’s founding vision for basic human rights. This is why we call on people and groups everywhere to uphold Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights—for adequate food, shelter, health care, and social security for all. We need massive, continuous, and worldwide demonstrations that petition governments to commit all necessary resources to prevent hunger and needless poverty-related deaths. With such a compassionate awareness on a global scale, we may finally see the intergovernmental cooperation and sharing of resources that is necessary to address this longstanding crisis.

As set out in Towards a Universal Basic Income for All Humanity by my colleague at Share the World’s Resources Mohammed Sofiane Mesbahi, this unprecedented empowerment of the United Nations could eventually open the door to much more than an emergency poverty-relief program. It is also the way to diminish the undue influence of corporations over the policymaking process; to redirect military spending and other harmful subsidies; to cancel unpayable sovereign debts; to clamp down on tax avoidance and evasion practices; to spur the renegotiation of unjust trade agreements; to introduce new sources of international taxation; and much more. Indeed, how else can governments guarantee the basic rights of Article 25 unless they share the world’s resources, and at the same time reverse the harmful pro-corporate priorities of the neoliberal era?

If we can seriously envision Article 25 becoming an enforceable law of human rights within the United Nations, then perhaps we can also envision the possibility of a UBI being debated by all member states as a means for achieving this ultimate objective. In other words, the idea of a truly universal or world basic income is a hopelessly forlorn prospect until humanity embraces the cause of Article 25 for absolutely everyone on earth.

That would not mean creating a supranational transfer system of some variety, and distributing a certain amount of money to all the world’s citizens via a centralized bureaucracy (especially not if it implies the creation of a world government). It would be imperative for sovereign nations to develop UBI systems democratically, and in accordance with their own specific means and domestic requirements

But we may anticipate the need, someday, for member states to abide by agreed international laws of the United Nations that determine the general principles and standards of each domestic UBI scheme. A global solidarity fund may be required as a key part of such a treaty, which could assist those nations that need ongoing financial support to develop an effective UBI scheme (alongside the expansion of universal public services and other social benefits). Perhaps it may even be possible to finance such a fund via a “commons trust” on a global scale, as promoted by various pioneering thinkers.

For the time being, such thoughts are wishful thinking so long as humanity hasn’t risen up for a fairer sharing of the world’s resources. It is also a case of putting the cart before the horse if we solely advocate for a basic income within the context of affluent nations alone. The transformational vision of a UBI is a compelling and beautifully simple idea, representing one of the most tangible demands for economic sharing in our day. But that vision will only come to fruition if UBI proponents expand that idea to the common good of all, and thus join the cause for heralding Article 25.

• Originally published as part of the Forum “Universal Basic Income: Has the Time Come?” by the Great Transition Initiative

The post Toward Global Sharing first appeared on Dissident Voice.

The Secret Agenda of the World Bank and IMF

The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) work hand in glove – smoothly. Not only are they regularly lending huge sums of money to horror regimes around the world, but they blackmail poor nations into accepting draconian conditions imposed by the west. In other words, the WB and the IMF are guilty of the most atrocious human rights abuses.

You couldn’t tell when you read above the entrance of the World Bank the noble phrase, “Our Dream is World Free of Poverty”. To this hypocrisy I can only add, ”…And we make sure it will just remain a dream.” This says both, the lie and the criminal nature of the two International Financial Institutions, created under the Charter of the United Nations but instigated by the United States.

The front of these institutions is brilliant. What meets the eye are investments in social infrastructure, in schools, health systems, basic needs like drinking water, sanitation – even environmental protection – over all “Poverty Alleviation”; i.e., A World Free of Poverty. But how fake this is today and was already in the 1970’s and 1980’s is astounding. Gradually people are opening their eyes to an abject reality, of exploitation and coercion and outright blackmail. And that, under the auspices of the United Nations. What does it tell you about the UN system? In what hands are the UN? The world organization was created in San Francisco, California, on 24 October 1945, just after WWII, by 51 nations, committed to maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations and promoting social progress, better living standards and human rights.

The UN replaced the League of Nations which was part of the Peace Agreement after WWI, the Treaty of Versailles. It became effective on 10 January 1920, was headquartered in Geneva Switzerland, with the purpose of disarmament, preventing war through collective security, settling disputes between countries, through negotiation diplomacy and improving global welfare. In hindsight it is easy to see that the entire UN system was set up as a hypocritical farce, making people believe that their mighty leaders only wanted peace. These mighty leaders were all westerners; the same that less than 20 years after the creation of the noble League of Nations, started World War II.

*****

This little introduction provides the context for what was eventually to become the UN-backed outgrowth for global theft, for impoverishing nations around the world, for exploitation of people, for human rights abuses and for shoveling huge amounts of assets from the bottom, from the people, to the oligarchy, the ever-smaller corporate elite – the so-called Bretton Woods Institutions.

In July 1944 more than 700 delegates of 44 Allied Nations (allied with the winners of WWII, including the Soviet Union) met at the Mount Washington Hotel, situated in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, United States, to regulate the international monetary and financial order after WWII. Let’s be sure, this conference was carried out under the auspices of the United States, the self-declared winner of WWII, and from now on forward the master over the financial order of the world – which was not immediately visible, an agenda hidden in plain sight.

The IMF was officially created to ‘regulate’ the western, so-called convertible currencies, those that subscribed to apply the rules of the new gold standard; i.e., US$ 35 / Troy Ounce (about 31.1 grams). Note that the gold standard, although applicable equally to 44 allied nations, was linked to the price of gold nominated in US dollars, not based on a basket of the value of the 44 national currencies. This already was enough reason to question the future system and how it would play out. But nobody questioned the arrangement. Hard to believe, though, that of all these national economists, none dared question the treacherous nature of the gold-standard set-up.

The World Bank, or the Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), was officially set up to administer the Marshall Plan for the Reconstruction of war-destroyed Europe. The Marshall Plan was a donation by the United Stated and was named for U.S. Secretary of State George Marshall, who proposed it in 1947. The plan gave $13.2 billion in foreign aid to European countries that had been devastated physically and economically by World War II. It was to be implemented from 1948 to 1952 which, of course, was much too short a time, and stretched into the early 1960s. In today’s terms the Marshall plan would be worth about 10 times more, or some US$ 135 billion.

The Marshall Plan was, and still is, a Revolving Fund, paid back by the countries in question, so that it could be relent. The Marshall Plan money was lent out multiple times and was therefore very effective. The European counterpart to the World Bank-administered Marshall Fund was a newly to be created bank set up under the German Ministry of Finance, The German Bank for Reconstruction and Development (KfW – German acronym for “Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau”).

KfW, as the World Bank’s European counterpart still exists and dedicates itself mostly to development projects in the Global South, now primarily with funds from the German Government and borrowed from the German and European capital markets. KfW often cooperates on joint projects with the World Bank. Today there is still a special Department within KfW that deals exclusively with Marshall Plan Fund money. These still revolving funds are used for lending to poor southern regions in Europe, and also to prop up Eastern European economies, and they were used especially to integrate former East-Germany into today’s “Grand Germany”.

Two elements of the Marshall Plan are particularly striking and noteworthy. First, the reconstruction plan created a bind, a dependence between the US and Europe, the very Europe that was largely destroyed by the western allied forces, while basically WWII was largely won by the Soviet Union, the huge sacrifices of the USSR – with an estimated 25 to 30 million deaths. So, the Marshall Plan was also designed as a shield against communist Russia; i.e., the USSR.

While officially the Soviet Union was an ally of the western powers, US, UK, and France, in reality the communist USSR was an arch-enemy of the west, especially the United States. With the Marshall Plan money, the US bought Europe’s alliance, a dependence that has not ended to this day – and has, and still is, preventing Europe from establishing normal relations with Russia, even though the Soviet Union disappeared three decades ago. The ensuing Cold War after WWII against the USSR, also all based on flagrant lies, was direct testimony for another western propaganda farce whichm to this day, most Europeans haven’t grasped yet.

Second, the US imposition of a US-dollar based reconstruction fund was not only creating a European dollar dependence, but was also laying the ground work for a singular currency, eventually to invade Europe — what we know today has become the Euro. The Euro is nothing but the foster child of the dollar, as it was created under the same image as the US-dollar.  It is a fiat currency, backed by nothing. The United Europe, or now called the European Union, was never really a union. It was never a European idea, but put forward by US Secret Services in disguise of a few treacherous European honchos. And every attempt to create a United Europe, a European Federation, with a European Constitution, similar to the United States, was bitterly sabotaged by the US, mostly through the US mole in the EU, namely the UK.

The US didn’t want a strong Europe, both economically and possibly over time also militarily (pop. EU 450 million, vs US pop. 330 million; 2019 EU GDP US$ 20.3 trillion equivalent, vs US GDP US$ 21.4 trillion. Most economists would agree that a common currency for a loose group of countries has no future, is not sustainable. There is no common Constitution, thus no common objective, financially, economically and militarily. A common currency is not sustainable in the long run under these unstable circumstances. This is more than visible only 20 years into the Euro. The eurozone is a desperate mess. In comes the European Central Bank (ECB), also a creation inspired by the FED and the US Treasury. The ECB has really no Central Bank function. It is rather a watch dog. Because each EU member country has still her own Central Bank, though with a drastically reduced sovereignty which the eurozone countries conceded to the ECB, without receiving any equivalent rights.

Out of the currently 27 EU members, only 19 are part of the Euro-zone. Those countries not part of the Eurozone; i.e., Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary, Sweden and more, have preserved their sovereign financial policy and do not depend on the ECB. This means had Greece opted out of the Eurozone when they were hit with the 2008/2009 manufactured “crisis”, Greece would now be well on her way to full recovery. It would not have been subject to the whims and dictates of the IMF, the infamous troika, European Commission (EC), ECB and IMF, but could have chosen to arrange their debt internally, as most debt was internal debt, no need to borrow from abroad.

In a 2015 bailout referendum, the Greek population voted overwhelmingly against the bailout, meaning against the new gigantic debt. However, the then Greek President Tsipras, went ahead as if the referendum had never taken place and approved the huge bailout despite almost 70% of the popular vote against it.

This is a clear indication of fraud, that no fair play was going on. Tsipras and/or his families may have been coerced to accept the bailout – or else. We may never know the true reason why Tsipras sold his people, the wellbeing of the Greek people to the oligarchs behind the IMF and World Bank – and put them into abject misery, with the highest unemployment in Europe, rampant poverty and skyrocketing suicide rates.

Greece may serve as an example on how other EU countries may fare if they don’t “behave” – meaning adhere to the unwritten golden rules of obedience to the international money masters.

This is scary.

*****

And now, in these times of covid, it is relatively easy. Poor countries, particularly in the Global South, already indebted by the plandemic, are increasing their foreign debt in order to provide their populations with basic needs. Or so they make you believe. Much of the debt accumulated by developing countries is domestic or internal debt, like the debt of the Global North. It doesn’t really need foreign lending institutions to wipe out local debt. Or have you seen one of the rich Global North countries borrowing from the IMF or the World Bank to master their debt?  Hardly!

So why would the Global South fall for it? Part corruption, part coercion, and partly direct blackmail. Yes, blackmail, one of the international biggest crimes imaginable, being committed by the foremost international UN-chartered financial institutions, the WB and the IMF.

For example, the whole world is wondering how come that an invisible enemy, a corona virus, hit all 193 UN member countries at once, so that Dr. Tedros, Director General of WHO, declares on 11 March a pandemic – no reason whatsoever since there were only 4,617 cases globally – but the planned result was a total worldwide lockdown on 16 March 2020. No exceptions. There were some countries who didn’t take it so seriously, like Brazil, Sweden, Belarus, some African countries, like Madagascar and Tanzania – developed their own rules and realized that wearing masks did more harm than good, and social distancing would destroy the social fabric of their cultures and future generations.

But the satanic deep dark state didn’t want anything to do with “independent” countries. They all had to follow the dictate from way above, from the Gates, Rockefellers, Soroses, et al elite, soon to be reinforced by Klaus Schwab, serving as the chief henchman of the World Economic Forum (WEF). Suddenly, you see in Brazil a drastic surge in new “cases”, no questions asked, massive testing, no matter that the infamous PCR tests are worthless, according to most serious scientists – see The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society (by Pascal Sacré – 5 November 2020)
(only sold and corrupted scientists, those paid by the national authorities, would still insist on the RT-PCR tests). Brazil’s Bolsonaro gets sick with the virus and the death count increases exponentially – as the Brazilian economy falls apart.

Coincidence? Hardly.

In comes the World Bank and/or the IMF, offering massive help mostly debt relief, either as grant or as low interest loans. But with massive strings attached: You must follow the rules laid out by WHO, you must follow the rules on massive testing on vaccination, when they become available, mandatary vaccination – if you conform to these and other country-specific rules, like letting western corporations tap your natural resources, continue privatizing your social infrastructure and services – you may receive, WB and IMF assistance.

Already in May 2020 the World Bank Group announced its emergency operations to fight COVID-19 had already reached 100 developing countries – home to 70% of the world’s population with lending of US$ 160 billion-plus. This means, by today, 6 months later and in the midst of the “Second Wave” the number of countries and the number of loans or “relief’ grants must have increased exponentially, having reached close to the 193 UN member countries. Which explains how all, literally all countries, even the most objecting African countries, like Madagascar and Tanzania, among the poorest of the poor, have succumbed to the coercion or blackmail of the infamous Bretton Woods Institutions.

These institutions have no quarrels in generating dollars, as the dollar is fiat money, not backed by any economy – but can be produced literally from hot air and lent to poor countries, either as debt or as grant. These countries, henceforth and for pressure of the international financial institutions, will forever become dependent on the western masters of salvation.  Covid-19 is the perfect tool for the financial markets to shovel assets from the bottom to the top.

In order to maximize the concentration of the riches on top, maybe one or two or even three new covid waves may be necessary. That’s all planned, The WEF has already foreseen the coming scenarios by its tyrannical book Covid-19 – The Great Reset. It’s all laid out. And our western intellectuals read it, analyze it, criticize it, but we do not shred it apart – we let it stand, and watch how the word moves in the Reset direction. And the plan is dutifully executed by the World Bank and the IMF – all under the guise of doing good for the world.

What’s different from the World Bank and IMF’s role before the covid plandemic?  Nothing. Just the cause for exploitation, indebtment, enslavement. When covid came along it became easy. Before then and up to the end of 2019, developing countries, mostly rich in natural resources of the kind the west covets, oil, gold, copper and other minerals, such as rare earths, would be approached by the WB, the IMF or both.

They could receive debt relief, so-called structural adjustment loans, no matter whether or not they really needed such debt. Today these loans come in all names, forms, shapes and colors, literally like color-revolutions, for instance, often as budget support operations.  I simply call them blank checks – nobody controls what’s happening with the money. However, the countries have to restructure their economies, rationalizing their public services, privatizing water, education, health services, electricity, highways, railroads – and granting foreign concessions for the exploitation of natural resources.

Most of this fraud –fraud on “robbing” national resources — passes unseen by the public at large, but countries become increasingly dependent on the western paymasters. People’s and institutional sovereignty is gone. There is always a corrupter and a corruptee. Unfortunately, they are still omni-present in the Global South. Often, for a chunk of money, the countries are forced to vote with the US for or against certain UN resolutions which are of interest to the US. Here we go – the corrupt system of the UN.

And, of course, when the two Bretton Woods organizations were created in 1944, the voting system decided is not one country, one vote as in theory it is in the UN, but the US has an absolute veto right in both organizations. Their voting rights are calculated in function of their capital contribution which derives from a complex formula, based on GDP and other economic indicators. In both institutions the US voting right and also veto right is about 17%. Both institutions have 189 member countries. None of these other countries have a voting right higher than 17%. The EU would have, but they were never allowed by the US to become a country or a Federation.

*****

Covid has laid bare, if it wasn’t already before, how these “official” international, UN-chartered Bretton Woods financial institutions are fully integrated in the UN system – in which most of the countries still trust, maybe for lack of anything better.

Question, however: What is better, a hypocritical corrupt system that provides the “appearance”, or the abolition of a dystopian system and the courage to create a new one, under new democratic circumstances and with sovereign rights by each participating country?

• First published by the New Eastern Outlook – NEO

The post The Secret Agenda of the World Bank and IMF first appeared on Dissident Voice.

As Israel Destroys EU Projects in Palestine, European Foreign Policy Remains Impotent

Belgium is furious. On November 6, the Belgian government condemned Israel’s destruction of Belgian-funded homes in the Occupied Palestinian West Bank. Understandably, Brussels wants the Israeli government to pay compensation for the unwarranted destruction. The Israeli response was swift: a resounding ‘no’.

The diplomatic row is likely to fizzle out soon; neither will Israel cease its illegal demolitions of Palestinian homes and structures in the West Bank nor will Belgium, or any other EU country, receive a dime from Tel Aviv.

Welcome to the bizarre world of European foreign policy in Palestine and Israel.

The EU still champions a two-state solution and advocates international law regarding the legality of the Israeli military occupation of the Palestinian territories. To make that possible, the EU has, for nearly four decades, funded Palestinian infrastructure as part of a state-building scheme. It is common knowledge that Israel rejects international law, the two-state solution and any kind of outside ‘pressure’ regarding its military occupation.

To back its position with action, Israel has been actively and systematically destroying EU-funded projects in Palestine. In doing so, it aims to send a message to the Europeans that their role in supporting the Palestinian quest for statehood is vehemently rejected. Indeed, in 2019 alone, 204 Palestinian structures were demolished just in Occupied East Jerusalem, according to the Euro-Med Monitor. Included in this destruction – in addition to similar demolition in the West Bank Area C – are 127 structures that were funded mostly by EU member states.

Yet, despite the fact that Israel has been on a crash course with the EU for years, Europe remains Israel’s number one trade partner. Worse, Europe is one of Israel’s largest weapons suppliers and also main market for Israel’s own weapons – often touted for being ‘combat-proven’, as in successfully used against Palestinians.

The contradiction does not end here.

In November 2019, the European Court of Justice ruled that EU countries must identify on their labels the specific products that are made in illegal Jewish settlements, a decision that was seen as an important first step to hold Israel accountable for its occupation. Yet, bizarrely, European activists who promote the boycott of Israeli products are often tried and indicted in European courts, based on the flimsy claim that such boycotts fall into the category of ‘anti-Semitism’. France, Germany and others have repeatedly utilized their judicial system to criminalize the legitimate boycott of the Israeli occupation.

And here, again, European contradictions and confused policies are evident with total clarity. Indeed, last September, Germany, France, Belgium and other EU members spoke firmly at the United Nations against Israel’s policy of demolition, which largely targeted EU-funded infrastructure. In their statement, the EU countries noted that “the period from March to August 2020 saw the highest average destruction rate in four years.”

Because of the absence of any meaningful European action on the Palestinian front, Israel no longer finds the European position, however rhetorically strong, worrisome. Just consider the defensible Belgian position on the destruction of Palestinian homes that were funded by the Belgian government in the village of Al-Rakeez, near Hebron (Al-Khalil).

“This essential infrastructure was built with Belgian funding, as part of humanitarian aid implemented by the West Bank Protection Consortium. Our country asks Israel for compensation or restitution for these destructions,” the Belgian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on November 6.

Now, marvel at the Israeli response, as communicated in a statement issued by Israel’s foreign ministry. “Donor states should utilize their tax payer’s (sic) money towards the funding of legal constructions and projects in territories that are controlled by Israel, and make sure those are planned and executed in accordance with the law and in coordination with the relevant Israeli authorities.”

But are Europeans violating any law by helping the Palestinians build schools, hospitals and homes in the Occupied Territories? And what ‘law’ is Israel following when it is systematically destroying hundreds of EU-funded Palestinian infrastructures?

Needless to say, the EU support for Palestinians is consistent with international law that recognizes the responsibility of all UN member states in helping an occupied nation achieve its independence. It is, rather, Israel that stands in violation of numerous UN resolutions, which have repeatedly demanded an immediate halt to Israel’s illegal settlement activities, home demolition and military occupation altogether.

Israel, however, has never been held accountable for its obligations under international law. So, when the Israeli foreign ministry speaks of ‘law’, it refers only to the unwarranted decisions made by the Israeli government and Knesset (parliament), such as the decision to illegally annex nearly a third of the West Bank, a massive swathe of Palestinian land that is located in Area C – this is where most of the destruction is taking place.

Israel considers that, by funding Palestinian projects in Area C, the EU is deliberately attempting to thwart Israel’s annexation plans in this region. The Israeli message to Europe is very clear: cease and desist, or the demolition will go on. Israeli arrogance has reached the point that, according to Euro-Med Monitor, in September 2014, Israel destroyed a Belgian-funded electrification project in the village of Khirbet Al Tawil, even though the project was, in fact, installed in coordination with Israel’s civil administration in the area.

Alas, despite the occasional protest, EU members are getting the message. The total number of internationally-funded projects in Area C for 2019 has shrunk to 12, several folds lower than previous years. Projects for 2020 are likely to be even lower.

The EU may continue to condemn and protest the Israeli destruction. However, angry statements and demands for compensation will fall on deaf Israeli ears if not backed by action.

The EU has much leverage over Israel. Not only is it refusing to leverage its high trade numbers and military hardware, but it is also punishing European civil society organizations for daring to challenge Israel.

The problem, then, is not typical Israeli obstinacy alone but Europe’s own foreign policy miscalculation – if not an all-out failure – as well.

The post As Israel Destroys EU Projects in Palestine, European Foreign Policy Remains Impotent first appeared on Dissident Voice.

World Economic Forum (WEF) Step Two:  “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” After The Great Reset

The WEF gang have just published (October 2020) a so-called White Paper, entitled “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda in a Post-Covid World”.

This 31-page document reads like a blueprint on how to “execute” because an execution it would be – “Covid-19 – The Great Reset” (July 2020), by Klaus Schwab, founder and CEO (since the foundation of the WEF in 1974) and his associate Thierry Malleret. They call “Resetting the Future” a White Paper, meaning it’s not quite a final version. It is a draft of sorts, a trial balloon, to measure people’s reactions. It reads indeed like an executioner’s tale. Many people may not read it, have no awareness of its existence. If they would, they would go up in arms and take up arms to fight this latest Nazi-enterprise offered to the world by the WEF.

It promises a horrifying future to some 80%-plus of the (surviving) population. George Orwell’s “1984” reads like a benign fantasy as compared to what the WEF has in mind for humanity.

The time frame is ten years. By 2030 the UN agenda 2021–2030 should be implemented.

Planned business measures in response to COVID-19:

  • An acceleration of digitized work processes, leading to 84% of all work processes as digital, or virtual/video conferences.
  • Some 83% of people are planned to work remotely; i.e., no more interaction between colleagues, absolute social distancing, separation of humanity from the human contact.
  • About 50% of all tasks are planned to be automated; in other words, human input will be drastically diminished, even while remote working.
  • Accelerate the digitization of upskilling/reskilling (e.g. education technology providers).  42% of skill upgrading or training for new skills will be digitized, in other words, no human contact, all on computer, Artificial Intelligence (AI), algorithms.
  • Accelerate the implementation of upskilling/reskilling programs.  35% of skills are planned to be “re-tooled”; i.e., existing skills are planned to be abandoned, declared defunct.
  • Accelerate ongoing organizational transformations (e.g. restructuring). 34% of current organizational set-ups are planned to be “restructured’, or in other words, existing organizational structures will be declared obsolete to make space for new sets of organizational frameworks, digital structures that provide utmost control over all activities.
  • Temporarily reassign workers to different tasks. This is expected to touch 30% of the work force. That also means completely different pay-scales, most probably unlivable wages, which would make the also planned “universal basic salary” or “basic income” a wage that allows you barely to survive, an obvious need. But it would make you totally dependent on the system, a digital system, where you have no control whatsoever.
  • Temporarily reduce workforce. This is projected as affecting 28% of the population. It is an additional unemployment figure, in disguise, as the “temporarily” will never come back to full-time.
  • Permanently reduce workforce: 13% permanently reduced workforce.
  • Temporarily increase workforce: 5%. There is no reference to what type of workforce, probably unskilled labor that sooner or later will also be replaced by automation, by AI and robotization of the workplace.
  • No specific measures implemented: 4%.  Does that mean a mere 4% will remain untouched? From the algorithm and AI-directed new work places? As small and insignificant as the figure is, it sounds like “wishful thinking”, never to be accomplished.
  • Permanently increase workforce. A mere 1% is projected as “permanently increased workforce”. This is, of course, not even cosmetics. It is a joke.

This is the state of the affair – of implementation of The Great Reset.  The Great Reset also foresees a credit scheme, whereby all personal debt would be “forgiven” against handing over all personal assets to an administrative body or agency – could possibly be the IMF.

So, you would own nothing and be happy. Because all your necessities will be provided for.  Also, it should not occur to you to disagree with the system, because by now each one of you has been covid-vaccinated and nano-chipped so that with 5G and soon to come 6G, your mind can be read and influenced.

Please do not call this conspiracy theory. DARPADefense Advanced Research Projects Agency is part of the Pentagon – and has years ago developed the technology. It is just a matter of time to implement it. And Implemented it will be, if We, The People, do not protest.  Massive Civil Disobedience is of the order and that rather sooner than later.

The more we wait with action, the more we sleepwalk into this absolute human disaster.

Human contact is being eviscerated.

This has several advantages for this Nazi-type novel WEF approach to humanity – to controlling humanity.  We, The People, cannot rebel.  We have no longer cohesion among ourselves.  “We, The People”, will be played against each other and there is an absolute digital control over humanity executed by a small super elite. We have no access to this digital control.  It is way beyond our reach. The idea is that we will gradually grow into it, those of us who may survive. Within a generation or so it is expected to become the New Normal.

The “survival angle” is an aspect not mentioned directly either in The Great Reset, or the “Implementation Guide”; i.e., in the White Paper “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda in a Post-Covid World”.

Bill Gates, the Rockefellers, Kissinger et al, have never even made a secret out of their strong opinion that the world is over-populated and that a sizable amount of people have to be literally eliminated. We are dealing with eugenicists.

A perfect method for decimating the world population are Bill Gates initiated and WHO-supported vaccination programs. Scandals of such disastrous and children-killing programs abound in India (in the 1990s), Kenya (2014 forward) and other parts of the world. See also a very revealing TedTalk by Bill Gates of February 2010, “Innovating to Zero”, just about at the time when the “2010 Rockefeller Report” was issued, the very report that has given us so far the “Lockstep Scenario”, and we are living it. Hardly protesting it; the entire world – 193 UN member countries — has been coopted or coerced into following this abject human rights abuse on a global scale.

What either report, “The Great Reset” and the “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” fails to mention is who is going to enforce these draconian new rules? They are supposedly the same forces which now are being trained for urban warfare and for suppressing riots and social unrest.  They are the police and the military.

Part of our People’s Organization of Civil Disobedience will be on how to focus on and talking to, educating, informing the police and military of what they will be used for by this small elite, and that in the end they are also just human beings like the rest of us.  Therefore they better stand up in defense of the people, of humanity. The same needs to be done to teachers and medical personnel – information, the unfettered truth

That’s the challenge. If we succeed the game is over. But it’s a long way. Media disinformation is brutal and powerful and hard to contradict for “us” without any sizable budget for counter-propaganda, and as a group of people which is ever more divided by the very media. The mandatory wearing masks and social distancing has already made enemies of what we used to be, colleagues, friends. Even within families, this very dictate has managed to create rifts and discord.

No fear – but shredding “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” and the “The Great Reset” literally to pieces — with a human alternative that would do away with organizations like the WEF, and coopted UN agencies like WHO, UNICEF, WTO, World Bank, IMF — and maybe even the entire UN system — and incarcerate their leaders after giving them due process — Nuremberg style.

The post World Economic Forum (WEF) Step Two:  “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” After The Great Reset first appeared on Dissident Voice.

The Communist Party of China: Putting the People First

Wherever we lift one soul from a life of poverty, we are defending human rights. And whenever we fail in this mission, we are failing human rights.

Kofi Annan, former United Nations Secretary-General

Among other items “proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,” the preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “… human beings shall enjoy freedom … from want.”

The UDHR preamble goes on to state that “fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person … have [been] determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom.”

Article 25(1) outlines what each human should rightfully be availed of:

Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

Accordingly, anyone lacking the rights listed in article 25(1) would be construed in some level of poverty.

Fortunately, the UN has committed itself to Ending Poverty, and it claims that it has made strides in that direction since 2000. However, Philip Alston, the UN special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, threw a monkey wrench into narrative that extreme poverty is nearing eradication based on the World Bank’s measure of extreme poverty. His report finds that more accurate measures indicate only a slight decrease in the fight against poverty in the past thirty years.

The current UN special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Olivier De Schutter, in his September 2020 report pointed to challenges in dealing with poverty such as the COVID-19 pandemic and “how climate change will have devastating consequences for people in poverty.”

In the capitalist United States, 2019 statistics revealed that 10.5 percent of Americans live in poverty, a drop of 1.3 percent from 2018 — the lowest published rate since such estimates began in 1959.

Currently, the poverty situation is exacerbated by COVID-19 along with the fact that there are about 26 million Americans without health coverage (2019 figures).

Capitalist Canada, which has universal medical care, also continues to struggle with poverty. This is apparent from the proliferation of tent cities — indicative of homelessness. Sadly, this poverty is not always greeted with compassion for the downtrodden.

Regardless of a plethora of western-based billionaires and several western companies listed in the Fortune 500, there is a moral argument to be made that a society that permits the poor to sink in a sea of plenty is, to put it mildly, an unfulfilled society.

Imagine instead a place where everyone has a home, water and ample nutritious food, adequate clothing, and no one needs to fear becoming injured or ill and not receiving medical care. If a nation were to achieve becoming a compassionate society where the basic needs of all are met, should it not be shouted from rooftops across the globe? Shouldn’t other countries be exploring how they could achieve such human rights for all its citizens?

However, there is no need to merely imagine because there is such a place soon to be free of poverty. But the rooftops elsewhere are largely silent. Why? Because such a monumental feat is not being feted by the capitalist countries of the world. In fact, the self-proclaimed leader of the so-called Free World (albeit not free of poverty) has made the eradicator of poverty the enemy du jour.

In the US, the descriptor “Communist” is used as a pejorative by president Donald Trump and his officials.

US secretary of state Mike Pompeo said, “We gave the Chinese Communist Party and the regime itself special economic treatment, only to see the CCP insist on silence over its human rights abuses as the price of admission for Western companies entering China.”

The self-admitted liar, cheater, and thief Pompeo alleges the contradiction that the CCP could be simultaneously pulling people out of poverty and committing human rights abuses. Why should anyone believe him?

Since the 1980s, the Communist Party of China had lifted over 700 million people out of poverty. Now, China is nearing its goal to eliminate absolute poverty in 2020. Chairman Xi Jinping, also general secretary of the CCP Central Committee and chairman of the Central Military Commission, has not wavered in ridding the country of poverty despite the imposition of COVID-19.

Xi has been feted by Chinese media for his visits and concern for poor villagers.

Poverty alleviation was a priority in his roughly 80 domestic inspections over the past eight years. These trips took him to some of the country’s most remote and impoverished areas.

He once cited an old Chinese adage: “Great leaders of nations treat their people like a father loves his son and an elder brother loves his younger sibling. They will be saddened to hear of their people’s hardship or toil.”

Xi’s personal history is one of having endured years of poverty, having spent much of his youth living with rural peasants. This experience contributed to Xi’s focus on poverty elimination.

Xi knows well that poverty is incompatible with socialism. Accordingly, the CCP has identified the factors causing poverty in various areas and devised for each case a custom poverty relief plan. The plans are then followed up on to ensure effective outcomes.

In Chinese history, the Mandate of Heaven justifies the ruler. The people are above the king whose rule is based upon the support of the people. To continue to rule, the king must ensure that the people are protected and provided for. This was reflected in Xi’s statement, “Poverty alleviation must have genuine effects that can win the approval of the people and stand the test of practice and history.”

Poverty is not just being fought on the Chinese homefront, China is also involved in the global anti-poverty fight, helping developing countries grow their economies and improve their people’s livelihoods. China’s Belt and Road Initiative has helped develop the economy of countries, creating employment and enhancing people’s lives.

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce reports that “Chinese companies’ non-financial direct investment in 54 countries along the Belt and Road grew by over 33 percent to reach 72.18 billion yuan in the first seven months of 2020.”

The World Bank estimates that worldwide the Belt and Road initiative could help lift about 7.6 million people from extreme poverty and 32 million from moderate poverty.

The Leading Nation

Although China is already the world’s biggest economy, it is the eradication of poverty that places China at the forefront of global nations. Leaders in other countries would do well to learn what is applicable from the Chinese experience and provide for the needs of the populace. As their nations are signatories to the UDHR, they have committed themselves to this undertaking.

Many challenges still face China and the CCP. As the ancient Chinese sage Lao Tzu said, a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.

China sees the elimination of poverty as a necessary step in becoming a moderately prosperous society in all facets.

The post The Communist Party of China: Putting the People First first appeared on Dissident Voice.

Superman Versus The Davos Despots

George Carlin warned all good Americans to think critically at their own peril.  Although life has now become somewhat difficult…even lonely at times, I have forsaken his fascetious advice.  When I was a child, my grandfather was my god.  Pops.  I can still see his steady eyes touching some secret place deep inside me as he softly said that there is only one unforgivable sin.  Nobody has the right to take another human life.  He was emphatic when he added that the worst offenders of this basic precept are world governments.  About that same time, in the early 1950’s, television arrived, and my 5-year-old self became one of earth’s first electronically hypnotized humans.  When the weekly Adventures of Superman began spilling out of the tiny screen, the excited little boy was already standing tall and defiant atop the ottoman, towel cape blowing in an imaginary wind.  Magically that boy became faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, and was able to leap tall buildings in a single bound.  More importantly, he was now deeply obsessed with joining in the never-ending battle for truth, justice, and the American way.  He did not yet have an inkling that truth and justice have little to do with the American way, but would soar directly into that kryptonite wall a few years later, in a minor squabble with the Phoenix, AZ. Draft board over whether or not he should join in the festivities of The Vietnam War.

Now, at 72, I struggle to stay in shape so my imaginary cape and tights aren’t too repulsive, although it’s not likely that anyone will see me since I’ve become the old neighborhood pariah who refuses surgical masks and denies the existence of a pandemic.  A menace to society am I.  Eight months of nearly solitary confinement have presented plenty of time for educational opportunities via computer, and the inevitable incongruities and questions which arise from newly gleaned information.  While the robber barons of Europe were busy conjuring up the First World War more than a century ago, on this side of the pond John D. Rockefeller had already transformed the face of organic medicine into an allopathic business model which facilitated the use of oil-based pharmaceuticals.  Conveniently, he already owned nearly all the oil.

In early 1918, while the troops were training for the European trenches at Fort Riley, Kansas, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine, cultured in horses, was widely administered to an untold number of the young men.  Almost immediately the Spanish Flu broke out at Fort Riley.  The troops who did not initially succumb to the disease then spread it across America, cross-infected entire troop ships, and carried it to European battlefields.  Important to note is that deaths were largely due to bacterial pneumonia, and not viral.   And The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, which created, produced, and distributed the vaccine, eagerly sent shipments off to England, France, Belgium, and Italy.  The result two years later was that the violence of mechanized warfare had claimed 20 to 25 million victims while the Spanish Flu killed 50 to 100 million worldwide.  There are extremely good reasons to believe that the “jab” was the cause of the disease, and it is likely that, given the ease in which the genocide was carried out, Rockefeller and his brethren realized what great potential was to be found in pharmaceuticals.

The Rockefeller Institute’s Annual Report of 1968 lamented failure in the field of population reduction:  “Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.”  Young Bill Gates was only 13 at the time, but would within a few decades proudly accept the relay baton of vaccine research and development from the pioneers in the field, and make great inroads into the perennial favorite subject of the billionaire industrialist community:  That officially “discredited”, although widely beloved field of eugenics.

Bill Gates was destined to pair up with Dr. Tony Fauci, for Fauci had proven to be an adept practitioner of the magic of viral alchemy, and had over a period of four decades created an AIDS Pandemic Industrial Complex, based on a benign passenger virus (HIV), which was even believed to be harmless by Dr. Luc Montagnier, one of the Nobel Prize winning isolators of the virus.  In 1981, after a few fast-living, big city American gay men came down with pneumocystis pneumonia, an affliction associated with immune deficiency common to such lifestyles, Fauci announced that the treatment was at hand.  AZT, a toxic chemotherapy drug which randomly destroys DNA synthesis in cells, was to become the magic bullet.  The drug had been previously banned by the FDA as too dangerous to treat cancer patients.  When they reversed the ban for the alleged HIV virus sufferers, there was a trumped up demand for AZT in the gay community.  Then the testing began, and they lined up, demanding to be tested.  Positive results rained down from the heavens in a deluge of cash, and asymptomatic men took AZT, based on fraudulent tests.  The gay men sickened and died like flies from long-term chemotherapy, whether immune deficient or not, and Fauci’s kill score, by some estimations, ballooned to more than 300,000.  Then he took his show to the Third World, where poor folks of all sexual persuasions are still being tested and poisoned under the watch of Tony Fauci and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  Death toll:  Who’s counting?  Congratulations to Dr. Fauci for pulling off nearly four decades of fatal fraud and deception.  There is, to this day, no definitive proof that the HIV virus causes AIDS, no research showing that AIDS exists as a single disease, and no approved vaccination.  The treatment is the disease, and there’s money to be made in fraudulent tests.

The globalists to whom fellow humans are mere human resources, have pulled off three industrial revolutions successfully, and have been long implementing their grand plans for the fourth, aided by able allies like Mr. Gates and Dr. Fauci.  The bond which joins these two caustic beings as one is the allegedly noble and just cause of ushering in The Fourth Industrial Revolution, on the back of a virus that hasn’t been isolated (therefore not proven to exist), which is being widely tested for by a PCR test not designed to test for the presence of viruses.  Billions of dollars are now being gifted to all the usual pharmaceutical suspects, and the world is being assured that a magic vaccine is on the way to save us all from…uh…this horrible virus that seems to be…uh…nowhere…and uh…killing nobody.  But you will be tested, and you will be vaccinated.  You will be shot in the head with a thermometer gun, and you will socially distance yourself, mask up, and get used to it.  Your government will insist…or at least strongly suggest you do so if you intend to ever leave your house again.  And when you thankfully take the vaccine…and as you sicken in its wake…you might begin to wonder whether the ugly stories about the Spanish Flu and AIDS might just have contained a grain or two of truth.

How fortunate I am to have powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal men.  If anyone can facilitate an end to this fake pandemic, ‘tis I.  For who else can change the course of mighty rivers, bend steel in his bare hands, and fight that never ending battle for truth and justice?  Who else has the x-ray vision to see how far astray the American way has wandered from any semblance of truth or justice?  We are already under siege by very recently installed toxic 5G radio frequencies, and stand on wobbly ground at the entrance to a circus of new, dark technologies.  Off in the near distance is the anti-human agenda of Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum,  and the Davos Despots.  No more dirty cash…all transactions will be in invisible money, and you WILL need a card…at least until you’ve gotten your own personal biometric/facial identity established.  Whether injected nanoparticles or skin tattoo, they should at least send out letters saying, “Congratulations!  You are now the biologically altered and patented property of The United States of America, a subsidiary of The United Nations of Earth Inc.  We know where you are, and we know what you’re doing.  Be a good citizen.  Think green and understand that you are a plague upon the earth.  You thoughtless humans have nearly ruined everything, but we, in our infinite wisdom, intend to remedy this situation.  Practice social distancing.  Avoid eye contact with others.  Do NOT procreate, nor even practice.  Sex is dirty and spreads real and imaginary viruses.  At a predetermined point in the future we’ll need you to enroll in our mandatory euthanasia program, and make way for the sparsely populated world we imagine and strive for.  Thanks in advance for your cooperation, and remember that we’re all making uncomfortable changes, giving up the things we love, and that we’re all in this together…except, of course, those few of us at the top of the food chain who determine your future or lack thereof.  Perhaps it may occur to you that this is unfair.  Sorry but we’re in charge.  Always have been, always will be.  Live with it, then die with it.  You ain’t shit.”

My grandfather’s words have never haunted me quite as much as they have lately.  To kill another human is the only unforgivable sin.  My Superman powers now tell me that humans, as we know us, are in imminent peril of extinction if the agenda of the Davos Despots is not resisted in every possible manner.  Americans, hanging on every word of Mumblish, muttered through the masked, muzzled mouths of MSNBC/FOX/CNN/PBS news actors, are locked in a state of deep hypnosis.  Too fucking bad that they haven’t been watching old Superman reruns, or even better, taking an unbiased look at the biggest scam ever pulled in human history:  Vaccines.

Sorry, potential Superpeople, but until you realize that even Doctor Salk was a fraud, and that there has never been a safe or effective vaccine in the history of the deathsport of vaccine development, you will never emerge from your cocoons of denial, and become the solution to mankind’s current dilemma.  Vaccine manufacturers operate completely risk-free.  They PAY for every word you hear on MSNBC/FOX/CNN/PBS…and the rest.  They PAY for pro-pharma legislation, with more than twice the cash doled out by 2nd place Big Oil.  They have become the most powerful force available to the Davos Despots in their quest for the Great Reset.  They are the enemies of truth, the wreckers of health, and the destroyers of justice.  This looks like a job for Superman.  For Supermen.  For Superwomen.  Sorry but there are only two sexes with multiple various deviations from what’s widely considered the norm, and 2 plus 2 still equals four.

They’re marching in protest of the virus fraud by the tens of thousands in the streets of Europe.  Our brothers and sisters across the pond have a history much more familiar with fascism than that of Americans.  Some still understand that resistance is the only alternative, and have been met with the expected pushback by militarized police forces.  In Berlin, where protests have been greatest, distant memories of Nazi Fascism are overlaid with years of Communist Fascism.  Perhaps the one facet of this dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which has been largely overlooked, is the end of the controversy over Capitalism and Communism.  Whether corporations control the state, or the state regulates capitalism, the scum invariably floats to the top, the people lose, and a worldwide cabal of wealthy industrialists and bankers shall inherit the earth.  Tucson, Arizona…my current home… really doesn’t look much different than footage I’ve seen of Beijing, China.  In the eyes of our globalist overlords, the whole lockdown, flurry of business closures and bankruptcies, resulting suicides, ventilator murders, nursing home closures, unauthorized DNR orders, oxygen deprivation via surgical masks, social distancing, and soul crushing fear have been a success worthy of celebration.  In short, all roads lead to Rome.  Life’s enemies won’t be easily stopped.  They can already see the goal, and they smell blood. And henceforth the words “freedom, truth, and justice” will be scrubbed from Facebook, and shall not be found on Google searches.  Neither in China nor the U.S.A.  That was an exaggeration, but not far from the truth.

Everyone knows that Superman does not waste time whining or playing the victim.  Heroes come in all shapes and sizes, but it would be highly unlikely to find one whining, lest it be a ploy to outwit one of those who seek to cancel life as we know it.  So we all need to face the fact, with capes blowing in the wind, that we’re under attack by our own government.  Don’t cry about it, Democrats!  And, yes, it’s true Republicans!  Your beloved party leaders are ALL cooperating with the WHO and various United Nations organizations in implementing the Great Global Reset agenda of the Davos Despots.  They have shut down our economy, sent society into a deadly tailspin, caused tens of thousands of deaths by suicide, medical malfeasance, neglect, loneliness, ad infinitum…and must be held to account for their vile actions.  Your beloved, elected leaders…your governors, senators, congressmen, and big city mayors were all sold on the grand globalist dreams, which were all well thought out and planned over many years.  They have lied to you and they have betrayed you.  Your governors, senators, congressmen, and mayors must be rounded up, jailed, prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder, and punished for their blatant crimes.  Perhaps we can someday forgive them, for they obviously knew not what the fuck they were doing.

“There is a superhero in all of us.  We just need the courage to put on the cape.” advised Superman.  Putting on the cape amounts to nothing more than speaking your truth loudly and refusing to submit to authority. Americans have been betrayed by the very people they elected to protect them.  Public elected officials in high offices have, almost without exception, sanctioned heinous crimes against humanity, and should all enjoy some quality prison time.  The vaccine/pharmaceutical deception has been going on too long.  Stop buying the lies.  “Social distancing’ and “new normal” are moronic oxymoron’s.  Our founding fathers seemed to embrace such concepts as equality, life, liberty, and happiness, and said it best in paragraph two of The Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

The post Superman Versus The Davos Despots first appeared on Dissident Voice.

Superman Versus The Davos Despots

George Carlin warned all good Americans to think critically at their own peril.  Although life has now become somewhat difficult…even lonely at times, I have forsaken his fascetious advice.  When I was a child, my grandfather was my god.  Pops.  I can still see his steady eyes touching some secret place deep inside me as he softly said that there is only one unforgivable sin.  Nobody has the right to take another human life.  He was emphatic when he added that the worst offenders of this basic precept are world governments.  About that same time, in the early 1950’s, television arrived, and my 5-year-old self became one of earth’s first electronically hypnotized humans.  When the weekly Adventures of Superman began spilling out of the tiny screen, the excited little boy was already standing tall and defiant atop the ottoman, towel cape blowing in an imaginary wind.  Magically that boy became faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, and was able to leap tall buildings in a single bound.  More importantly, he was now deeply obsessed with joining in the never-ending battle for truth, justice, and the American way.  He did not yet have an inkling that truth and justice have little to do with the American way, but would soar directly into that kryptonite wall a few years later, in a minor squabble with the Phoenix, AZ. Draft board over whether or not he should join in the festivities of The Vietnam War.

Now, at 72, I struggle to stay in shape so my imaginary cape and tights aren’t too repulsive, although it’s not likely that anyone will see me since I’ve become the old neighborhood pariah who refuses surgical masks and denies the existence of a pandemic.  A menace to society am I.  Eight months of nearly solitary confinement have presented plenty of time for educational opportunities via computer, and the inevitable incongruities and questions which arise from newly gleaned information.  While the robber barons of Europe were busy conjuring up the First World War more than a century ago, on this side of the pond John D. Rockefeller had already transformed the face of organic medicine into an allopathic business model which facilitated the use of oil-based pharmaceuticals.  Conveniently, he already owned nearly all the oil.

In early 1918, while the troops were training for the European trenches at Fort Riley, Kansas, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine, cultured in horses, was widely administered to an untold number of the young men.  Almost immediately the Spanish Flu broke out at Fort Riley.  The troops who did not initially succumb to the disease then spread it across America, cross-infected entire troop ships, and carried it to European battlefields.  Important to note is that deaths were largely due to bacterial pneumonia, and not viral.   And The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, which created, produced, and distributed the vaccine, eagerly sent shipments off to England, France, Belgium, and Italy.  The result two years later was that the violence of mechanized warfare had claimed 20 to 25 million victims while the Spanish Flu killed 50 to 100 million worldwide.  There are extremely good reasons to believe that the “jab” was the cause of the disease, and it is likely that, given the ease in which the genocide was carried out, Rockefeller and his brethren realized what great potential was to be found in pharmaceuticals.

The Rockefeller Institute’s Annual Report of 1968 lamented failure in the field of population reduction:  “Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.”  Young Bill Gates was only 13 at the time, but would within a few decades proudly accept the relay baton of vaccine research and development from the pioneers in the field, and make great inroads into the perennial favorite subject of the billionaire industrialist community:  That officially “discredited”, although widely beloved field of eugenics.

Bill Gates was destined to pair up with Dr. Tony Fauci, for Fauci had proven to be an adept practitioner of the magic of viral alchemy, and had over a period of four decades created an AIDS Pandemic Industrial Complex, based on a benign passenger virus (HIV), which was even believed to be harmless by Dr. Luc Montagnier, one of the Nobel Prize winning isolators of the virus.  In 1981, after a few fast-living, big city American gay men came down with pneumocystis pneumonia, an affliction associated with immune deficiency common to such lifestyles, Fauci announced that the treatment was at hand.  AZT, a toxic chemotherapy drug which randomly destroys DNA synthesis in cells, was to become the magic bullet.  The drug had been previously banned by the FDA as too dangerous to treat cancer patients.  When they reversed the ban for the alleged HIV virus sufferers, there was a trumped up demand for AZT in the gay community.  Then the testing began, and they lined up, demanding to be tested.  Positive results rained down from the heavens in a deluge of cash, and asymptomatic men took AZT, based on fraudulent tests.  The gay men sickened and died like flies from long-term chemotherapy, whether immune deficient or not, and Fauci’s kill score, by some estimations, ballooned to more than 300,000.  Then he took his show to the Third World, where poor folks of all sexual persuasions are still being tested and poisoned under the watch of Tony Fauci and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  Death toll:  Who’s counting?  Congratulations to Dr. Fauci for pulling off nearly four decades of fatal fraud and deception.  There is, to this day, no definitive proof that the HIV virus causes AIDS, no research showing that AIDS exists as a single disease, and no approved vaccination.  The treatment is the disease, and there’s money to be made in fraudulent tests.

The globalists to whom fellow humans are mere human resources, have pulled off three industrial revolutions successfully, and have been long implementing their grand plans for the fourth, aided by able allies like Mr. Gates and Dr. Fauci.  The bond which joins these two caustic beings as one is the allegedly noble and just cause of ushering in The Fourth Industrial Revolution, on the back of a virus that hasn’t been isolated (therefore not proven to exist), which is being widely tested for by a PCR test not designed to test for the presence of viruses.  Billions of dollars are now being gifted to all the usual pharmaceutical suspects, and the world is being assured that a magic vaccine is on the way to save us all from…uh…this horrible virus that seems to be…uh…nowhere…and uh…killing nobody.  But you will be tested, and you will be vaccinated.  You will be shot in the head with a thermometer gun, and you will socially distance yourself, mask up, and get used to it.  Your government will insist…or at least strongly suggest you do so if you intend to ever leave your house again.  And when you thankfully take the vaccine…and as you sicken in its wake…you might begin to wonder whether the ugly stories about the Spanish Flu and AIDS might just have contained a grain or two of truth.

How fortunate I am to have powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal men.  If anyone can facilitate an end to this fake pandemic, ‘tis I.  For who else can change the course of mighty rivers, bend steel in his bare hands, and fight that never ending battle for truth and justice?  Who else has the x-ray vision to see how far astray the American way has wandered from any semblance of truth or justice?  We are already under siege by very recently installed toxic 5G radio frequencies, and stand on wobbly ground at the entrance to a circus of new, dark technologies.  Off in the near distance is the anti-human agenda of Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum,  and the Davos Despots.  No more dirty cash…all transactions will be in invisible money, and you WILL need a card…at least until you’ve gotten your own personal biometric/facial identity established.  Whether injected nanoparticles or skin tattoo, they should at least send out letters saying, “Congratulations!  You are now the biologically altered and patented property of The United States of America, a subsidiary of The United Nations of Earth Inc.  We know where you are, and we know what you’re doing.  Be a good citizen.  Think green and understand that you are a plague upon the earth.  You thoughtless humans have nearly ruined everything, but we, in our infinite wisdom, intend to remedy this situation.  Practice social distancing.  Avoid eye contact with others.  Do NOT procreate, nor even practice.  Sex is dirty and spreads real and imaginary viruses.  At a predetermined point in the future we’ll need you to enroll in our mandatory euthanasia program, and make way for the sparsely populated world we imagine and strive for.  Thanks in advance for your cooperation, and remember that we’re all making uncomfortable changes, giving up the things we love, and that we’re all in this together…except, of course, those few of us at the top of the food chain who determine your future or lack thereof.  Perhaps it may occur to you that this is unfair.  Sorry but we’re in charge.  Always have been, always will be.  Live with it, then die with it.  You ain’t shit.”

My grandfather’s words have never haunted me quite as much as they have lately.  To kill another human is the only unforgivable sin.  My Superman powers now tell me that humans, as we know us, are in imminent peril of extinction if the agenda of the Davos Despots is not resisted in every possible manner.  Americans, hanging on every word of Mumblish, muttered through the masked, muzzled mouths of MSNBC/FOX/CNN/PBS news actors, are locked in a state of deep hypnosis.  Too fucking bad that they haven’t been watching old Superman reruns, or even better, taking an unbiased look at the biggest scam ever pulled in human history:  Vaccines.

Sorry, potential Superpeople, but until you realize that even Doctor Salk was a fraud, and that there has never been a safe or effective vaccine in the history of the deathsport of vaccine development, you will never emerge from your cocoons of denial, and become the solution to mankind’s current dilemma.  Vaccine manufacturers operate completely risk-free.  They PAY for every word you hear on MSNBC/FOX/CNN/PBS…and the rest.  They PAY for pro-pharma legislation, with more than twice the cash doled out by 2nd place Big Oil.  They have become the most powerful force available to the Davos Despots in their quest for the Great Reset.  They are the enemies of truth, the wreckers of health, and the destroyers of justice.  This looks like a job for Superman.  For Supermen.  For Superwomen.  Sorry but there are only two sexes with multiple various deviations from what’s widely considered the norm, and 2 plus 2 still equals four.

They’re marching in protest of the virus fraud by the tens of thousands in the streets of Europe.  Our brothers and sisters across the pond have a history much more familiar with fascism than that of Americans.  Some still understand that resistance is the only alternative, and have been met with the expected pushback by militarized police forces.  In Berlin, where protests have been greatest, distant memories of Nazi Fascism are overlaid with years of Communist Fascism.  Perhaps the one facet of this dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which has been largely overlooked, is the end of the controversy over Capitalism and Communism.  Whether corporations control the state, or the state regulates capitalism, the scum invariably floats to the top, the people lose, and a worldwide cabal of wealthy industrialists and bankers shall inherit the earth.  Tucson, Arizona…my current home… really doesn’t look much different than footage I’ve seen of Beijing, China.  In the eyes of our globalist overlords, the whole lockdown, flurry of business closures and bankruptcies, resulting suicides, ventilator murders, nursing home closures, unauthorized DNR orders, oxygen deprivation via surgical masks, social distancing, and soul crushing fear have been a success worthy of celebration.  In short, all roads lead to Rome.  Life’s enemies won’t be easily stopped.  They can already see the goal, and they smell blood. And henceforth the words “freedom, truth, and justice” will be scrubbed from Facebook, and shall not be found on Google searches.  Neither in China nor the U.S.A.  That was an exaggeration, but not far from the truth.

Everyone knows that Superman does not waste time whining or playing the victim.  Heroes come in all shapes and sizes, but it would be highly unlikely to find one whining, lest it be a ploy to outwit one of those who seek to cancel life as we know it.  So we all need to face the fact, with capes blowing in the wind, that we’re under attack by our own government.  Don’t cry about it, Democrats!  And, yes, it’s true Republicans!  Your beloved party leaders are ALL cooperating with the WHO and various United Nations organizations in implementing the Great Global Reset agenda of the Davos Despots.  They have shut down our economy, sent society into a deadly tailspin, caused tens of thousands of deaths by suicide, medical malfeasance, neglect, loneliness, ad infinitum…and must be held to account for their vile actions.  Your beloved, elected leaders…your governors, senators, congressmen, and big city mayors were all sold on the grand globalist dreams, which were all well thought out and planned over many years.  They have lied to you and they have betrayed you.  Your governors, senators, congressmen, and mayors must be rounded up, jailed, prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder, and punished for their blatant crimes.  Perhaps we can someday forgive them, for they obviously knew not what the fuck they were doing.

“There is a superhero in all of us.  We just need the courage to put on the cape.” advised Superman.  Putting on the cape amounts to nothing more than speaking your truth loudly and refusing to submit to authority. Americans have been betrayed by the very people they elected to protect them.  Public elected officials in high offices have, almost without exception, sanctioned heinous crimes against humanity, and should all enjoy some quality prison time.  The vaccine/pharmaceutical deception has been going on too long.  Stop buying the lies.  “Social distancing’ and “new normal” are moronic oxymoron’s.  Our founding fathers seemed to embrace such concepts as equality, life, liberty, and happiness, and said it best in paragraph two of The Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

The post Superman Versus The Davos Despots first appeared on Dissident Voice.